[2014] FWCA 2963 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Leaway Investments Pty Ltd T/A Civitest Sou West
(AG2014/1025)
CIVITEST SOU WEST ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 9 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Civitest Sou West Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Civitest Sou West Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172(2)(b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is three and a half years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407990 PR550287>
- AGLC
- Leaway Investments Pty Ltd T/A Civitest Sou West [2014] FWCA 2963
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2963
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the agreement contained all the required terms and conditions and whether it met the standards set by the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the commission needed to assess if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, including pay rates, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The union argued that certain aspects of the agreement were deficient, while the company contended that the agreement was comprehensive and fair.
After reviewing the agreement and hearing submissions from both parties, the commission found that the Civitest Sou West Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014 met the legislative requirements for approval. The commission determined that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms of employment, including adequate pay rates and conditions, and appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The commission was satisfied that the agreement would serve the interests of both the company and the employees.
As a result, the commission approved the agreement. The final orders included the approval of the Civitest Sou West Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2014, which would now govern the terms and conditions of employment for workers at the Roy Hill mine. This decision ensures that the agreement is legally binding and provides a framework for the relationship between the company and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.