Leanne McGregor v Lre Trust Pty

Case [2022] FWC 2988


[2022] FWC 2988

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Leanne McGregor
v

LRE Trust Pty

(U2022/9915)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 10 NOVEMBER 2022

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – unpaid application – dismissal under s.587(1)(a) at the Commission’s initiative

  1. On 10 October 2022 Ms Leanne McGregor made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that Ms McGregor did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 11 October 2022 the Commission emailed correspondence to Ms McGregor’s nominated email address advising that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with her application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 7 days, the application may be dismissed. An SMS notification was also sent to Ms McGregor’s telephone number, advising of the need to pay the application fee by actioning the payment request email from Fair Work Commission.

  1. On 25 October 2022, the Commission attempted to contact Ms McGregor on her nominated telephone number to discuss payment of the required fee, however Ms McGregor did not answer the call. The Commission was not able to leave a voice mail. Later that day the commission emailed correspondence to Ms McGregor’s nominated email address reminding that their application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if they wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received, the application may be dismissed.

  1. A final attempt to contact Ms McGregor via telephone was made by the Commission on 27 October 2022 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered, and the Commission was not able to leave a voicemail message.

  1. To date there has been no response from Ms McGregor, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An order[1] to this effect will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER


[1] PR747820

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR747819>

Details
AGLC
Leanne McGregor v Lre Trust Pty [2022] FWC 2988
Case
[2022] FWC 2988
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission, under Commissioner Bissett, dealt with an application for unfair dismissal made by Ms Leanne McGregor against LRE Trust Pty. The application was incomplete, lacking both the requisite fee and a completed waiver form, prompting the Commission to contact Ms McGregor on multiple occasions to rectify the issue. Despite these attempts, Ms McGregor did not respond, leading the Commission to dismiss the application under section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether Ms McGregor's application for unfair dismissal complied with the procedural requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the application met the criteria for dismissal under section 587(1)(a), which includes applications not made in accordance with the Act. Given that the application fee was not paid and no waiver form was submitted, the Commission concluded that the application did not comply with the necessary procedural requirements.

In reaching its decision, the Commission meticulously reviewed the procedural steps taken and noted that Ms McGregor did not respond to any of the attempts to contact her regarding the incomplete application. The Commission emphasized that section 395 of the Fair Work Act mandates the payment of a prescribed fee for applications to the FWC, and section 587(1)(a) allows for the dismissal of applications that are not made in accordance with the Act. Given that the application was neither accompanied by the required fee nor a waiver form, the Commission found the application to be non-compliant and dismissed it accordingly.

The Commission's final order dismissed Ms McGregor's application for unfair dismissal on the basis that it was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act. An order to this effect was issued shortly after the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.