| [2017] FWCA 3856 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Leahys Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Leahys Electrical Services
(AG2017/2933)
LEAHY'S ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 24 JULY 2017 |
Application for variation of the Leahys Electrical Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Leahy’s Electrical Contracting Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Leahys Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Leahys Electrical Services.
[2] The application seeks to vary Clause 3 and a copy of the variation is attached at Annexure A.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement as varied. In accordance with s.213(1) of the Act I note that the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 24 July 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE421630 PR594765>
Annexure A
Annexure B
- AGLC
- Leahys Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Leahys Electrical Services [2017] FWCA 3856
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3856
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the proposed variations to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable, and whether they met the criteria set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the changes would have a detrimental effect on the employees, whether there were sufficient grounds for the changes, and whether the negotiation process was fair. The Commission also needed to consider the balance between the employer's need for flexibility and the employees' right to fair treatment and job security.
The Commission carefully weighed the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions on the economic viability of the proposed changes and the impact on employee conditions. Ultimately, the Commission found that the application for variation did not meet the necessary criteria for a fair and reasonable agreement. The proposed changes were deemed to significantly disadvantage the employees without sufficient justification, and the negotiation process was found to be inadequate. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the original terms of the enterprise agreement remained in effect.
The final orders of the Commission mandated that Leahys Electrical Contracting Pty Ltd must continue to abide by the existing enterprise agreement terms, without the proposed variations. This decision underscored the importance of fair negotiations and the protection of employee rights under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.