Leach and Leahy
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 1178
•6 June 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Leach and Leahy [2014] FCCA 1178
[2014] FCCA 1178
6 June 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Leach and Leahy*, heard before Judge Antoni Lucev, the dispute concerned the division of property between the parties. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the general context of property division, is not detailed in the provided text.
The court was required to determine the terms of a consent order to give effect to its reasons for judgment. In the event that the parties could not reach an agreement on these terms, the court would then be required to determine the proposed orders put forward by each party. The court also needed to consider any applications for costs.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, the orders indicate a process for achieving a final resolution of the property dispute. The court directed the parties to confer and attempt to reach a consent order. If this proved unsuccessful, the court outlined a procedure for each party to submit their proposed orders for the court's determination. The court also established a timeline for the submission and determination of any costs applications.
The court made orders for the parties to confer and file a minute of proposed consent order by 27 June 2014. If agreement could not be reached, each party was to file their own proposed order by 11 July 2014, with the matter to be mentioned on 22 July 2014. Applications for costs were to be made in writing by 8 August 2014, with replies by 15 August 2014, and to be determined by the court on the papers.
The court was required to determine the terms of a consent order to give effect to its reasons for judgment. In the event that the parties could not reach an agreement on these terms, the court would then be required to determine the proposed orders put forward by each party. The court also needed to consider any applications for costs.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, the orders indicate a process for achieving a final resolution of the property dispute. The court directed the parties to confer and attempt to reach a consent order. If this proved unsuccessful, the court outlined a procedure for each party to submit their proposed orders for the court's determination. The court also established a timeline for the submission and determination of any costs applications.
The court made orders for the parties to confer and file a minute of proposed consent order by 27 June 2014. If agreement could not be reached, each party was to file their own proposed order by 11 July 2014, with the matter to be mentioned on 22 July 2014. Applications for costs were to be made in writing by 8 August 2014, with replies by 15 August 2014, and to be determined by the court on the papers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Leach and Leahy [2014] FCCA 1178
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
5
Wilson and Wilson
[2013] FamCAFC 43
Wilson and Wilson
[2013] FamCAFC 43
Wilson and Wilson
[2013] FamCAFC 43