Le v Pham

Case

[2022] ACAT 25

28 March 2022


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Le v Pham [2022] ACAT 25 [2022] ACAT 25 28 March 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Tribunal was asked to determine a dispute between the applicants and the respondents over the ownership of certain property. The applicants sought an order that they were the lawful owners of the property and that the respondents be ordered to vacate the property and compensate the applicants for its use. The case was heard by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.

The legal issues before the Tribunal included whether the applicants had established that they were the lawful owners of the property, and if so, whether the respondents had to vacate the property and compensate the applicants. The Tribunal found that the applicants had established their claim and that the respondents were in unlawful possession of the property. The Tribunal also found that the applicants were entitled to compensation for the use of the property by the respondents.

The Tribunal considered the evidence of the parties and the law applicable to the case. The Tribunal found that the applicants had provided sufficient evidence to establish their claim, including evidence of their ownership of the property and the respondents' unlawful possession. The Tribunal also found that the applicants were entitled to compensation for the use of the property by the respondents, and set the amount of compensation at $1,146.40 for the first applicant and $4,884.86 for the second applicant.

The Tribunal made orders that the first respondent pay the first applicant the sum of $1,146.40 and that the respondents pay the second applicant the sum of $4,884.86. The Tribunal also made orders that the respondents vacate the property and deliver it to the applicants. The Tribunal did not make any orders as to costs.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Compensatory Damages

  • Costs

  • Judicial Review

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

12

Statutory Material Cited

0

Cervo v Kingsley's Pty Ltd [2018] ACTSC 179
Le v Nguyen (Appeal) [2017] ACAT 55