[2013] FWCA 487 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14300)
LCR MINING GROUP PTY LTD JELLINBAH AND YARRABEE HAULAGE PROJECTS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER ASBURY | BRISBANE, 21 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd Jellinbah and Yarrabee Haulage Projects Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd Jellinbah and Yarrabee Haulage Projects Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 18 January 2013 undertakings were provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 28 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899492 PR533387>
- AGLC
- LCR Mining Group Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 487
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 487
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address were whether the agreement had been made in good faith and if it contained all the mandated terms and conditions as stipulated by the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine if the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, considering the extent of the negotiations and the representation of the workforce. Another aspect was whether the agreement covered all the minimum terms prescribed by the Fair Work Act and if it was fair and reasonable in the context of the industry and the specific enterprise.
The court found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and covered all the required minimum terms. The applicants demonstrated that they had engaged in genuine negotiations with the workforce, represented by the relevant union, and that the agreement reflected the interests of both parties. The court further concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the industry standards and the specific circumstances of the enterprise. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, allowing it to be formally recognised and enforceable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.