| [2024] FWCA 1861 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
LCE Queensland Pty Ltd
(AG2024/1569)
LCE QUEENSLAND PTY LTD QUEEN'S WHARF PROJECT AGREEMENT 2022
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 22 MAY 2024 |
Application for approval of the LCE Queensland Pty Ltd Queen's Wharf Project Agreement 2022
LCE Queensland Pty Ltd has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the LCE Queensland Pty Ltd Queen’s Wharf Project Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
I note that the Agreement was made with the CEPU and therefore covers this organisation (see s 53(2)(b)).
The Agreement was approved on 22 May 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524712 PR775232>
- AGLC
- LCE Queensland Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 1861
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1861
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Act. Specifically, it needed to assess whether the agreement was in the best interests of the state, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable allocation of risks and benefits, and whether it complied with all relevant laws and policies. The court also had to consider the potential economic impact of the project on the state and the public.
The court found that the agreement met all the criteria for approval. It determined that the project would bring significant economic benefits to the state, including job creation, increased tourism, and improved infrastructure. The court also found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable allocation of risks and benefits between the parties, and that it complied with all relevant laws and policies. The court approved the agreement and ordered that it be registered with the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Queensland.
The court's approval of the agreement is significant for the development of the Queen's Wharf precinct, which is a key economic driver for Brisbane. The agreement provides a framework for the delivery of the project and sets out the roles and responsibilities of the parties. The court's decision provides certainty for the project and ensures that it will proceed in a manner that is in the best interests of the state.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.