Lazarus, Sandra v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 125
•29 May 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lazarus, Sandra v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 125
[2019] NSWCA 125
29 May 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned a judicial review of orders made by the District Court of New South Wales in its criminal jurisdiction, arising from an appeal from the Local Court. The applicant, Ms Sandra Lazarus, was subject to custodial sentences, and the dispute centred on the commencement date of those sentences following a stay of execution. The proceedings were heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales by Bell P, Basten JA, and Simpson AJA.
The primary legal issues before the Supreme Court were the validity of warrants of commitment issued by the District Court, and the correct commencement dates for Ms Lazarus's custodial sentences, given that their execution had been stayed. The Court was required to determine how the statutory stay provisions affected the commencement of these sentences and, consequently, the commencement of any associated parole orders.
The Court reasoned that the warrants of commitment, despite the stay of execution, remained valid authority for the committal of Ms Lazarus. However, the execution of the sentences recorded in those warrants did not commence on the dates initially stated (12 December 2017 and 12 June 2018) because of the statutory stay. Instead, the Court declared that the first sentence commenced on 8 May 2019, when the statutory stay terminated, and the second sentence would commence six months later, on 8 November 2019. The parole orders were also declared to commence at the expiry of the non-parole periods, calculated from these revised commencement dates. The Court accordingly remitted the matter to the District Court for amendment of the warrants and parole orders. An oral application for a further stay of execution was refused.
The primary legal issues before the Supreme Court were the validity of warrants of commitment issued by the District Court, and the correct commencement dates for Ms Lazarus's custodial sentences, given that their execution had been stayed. The Court was required to determine how the statutory stay provisions affected the commencement of these sentences and, consequently, the commencement of any associated parole orders.
The Court reasoned that the warrants of commitment, despite the stay of execution, remained valid authority for the committal of Ms Lazarus. However, the execution of the sentences recorded in those warrants did not commence on the dates initially stated (12 December 2017 and 12 June 2018) because of the statutory stay. Instead, the Court declared that the first sentence commenced on 8 May 2019, when the statutory stay terminated, and the second sentence would commence six months later, on 8 November 2019. The parole orders were also declared to commence at the expiry of the non-parole periods, calculated from these revised commencement dates. The Court accordingly remitted the matter to the District Court for amendment of the warrants and parole orders. An oral application for a further stay of execution was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Sentencing
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Dacich v Picton Local Court [2020] NSWSC 1714
Cases Citing This Decision
5
Dougan v Mann
[2025] NSWCA 109
Young v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
[2023] NSWCA 69
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District v Lazarus
[2020] NSWCA 183
Cases Cited
22
Statutory Material Cited
15
Tay v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)
[2014] NSWCA 53
Whan v McConaghy
[1984] HCA 22
Whan v McConaghy
[1984] HCA 22