Lawrie v Hwang
Case
•
[2013] QSC 289
•23 October 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lawrie v Hwang [2013] QSC 289
[2013] QSC 289
23 October 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Lawrie v Hwang, the applicant sought leave under the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) to apply for an order authorising the creation of a statutory will for his father, Keith John Lawrie, who suffered from dementia. The applicant's father had recently married the respondent, which resulted in the revocation of his previous will under section 14 of the Act, leaving him without a valid will. The applicant argued that if his father had testamentary capacity, he would not want any part of his estate to pass to the respondent due to her allegedly dishonest conduct in transferring his assets. The respondent sought an adjournment of the proceedings.
The court had to determine whether the proceedings should be adjourned, whether Keith John Lawrie lacked testamentary capacity, and whether the proposed statutory will was or might be one that Keith John Lawrie would make if he had testamentary capacity. The court also had to decide on the issue of costs, specifically whether they should be paid out of the estate on an indemnity basis.
The court granted the applicant leave to apply for an order under section 22 of the Act and authorised the making of a will in terms of the draft will provided. The court held that the proceedings should not be adjourned as the application was made in the best interests of the applicant’s father. The court found that Keith John Lawrie lacked testamentary capacity and that the proposed statutory will was one he would make if he had testamentary capacity. Lastly, the court ordered that the applicant's costs of and incidental to the application be assessed on the indemnity basis and paid out of the assets of Keith John Lawrie.
The court had to determine whether the proceedings should be adjourned, whether Keith John Lawrie lacked testamentary capacity, and whether the proposed statutory will was or might be one that Keith John Lawrie would make if he had testamentary capacity. The court also had to decide on the issue of costs, specifically whether they should be paid out of the estate on an indemnity basis.
The court granted the applicant leave to apply for an order under section 22 of the Act and authorised the making of a will in terms of the draft will provided. The court held that the proceedings should not be adjourned as the application was made in the best interests of the applicant’s father. The court found that Keith John Lawrie lacked testamentary capacity and that the proposed statutory will was one he would make if he had testamentary capacity. Lastly, the court ordered that the applicant's costs of and incidental to the application be assessed on the indemnity basis and paid out of the assets of Keith John Lawrie.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Succession Law
Legal Concepts
-
Testamentary Capacity
-
Statutory Wills
-
Indemnity Basis Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Lawrie v Hwang [2013] QSC 289
Most Recent Citation
MZY v RYI [2019] QSC 89
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
Lawrie v Hwang
[2012] QSC 422
Sadler v Eggmolesse
[2013] QSC 40
McKay v McKay
[2011] QSC 230