LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 9 OCTOBER 2019
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
Tasmania Health Service
v
J
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Bradley Scott Purkiss
Margaret Anne Otto
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Bail Application
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jake Christopher Morgan (part-heard)
Kyam Keith Broadby
To Follow:
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Adrian Alwyn Pickett
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
4:15p.m.
For Bail Consent via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
ACS
For Mention via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
PT
SJH
For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Kristy Jayne Grant
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.30 am
Emilia Della Torre v Antonio Patriarca
Originating application/Extend caveat
10 am
In the matter of the Testator’s Family Maintenance Act 1912:
Sally Baily v Mark Richard De Vries
Medical evidence
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Bail Application via Video Link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Bail Application
2:15p.m.
Jake Christopher Morgan (part-heard)
Kyam Keith Broadby
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Bail Consent via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
4:15p.m.
ACS
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Mention via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
PT
SJH
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kristy Jayne Grant
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 9 October 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 188
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 188
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved the interpretation and application of health service legislation and regulations. The court had to consider the rights and obligations of the parties involved and determine whether any breaches of the law had occurred. The court also had to consider any relevant precedent and case law that may have been applicable to the case.
The court's reasoning and outcome were based on a thorough examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court considered the relevant legislation and regulations and determined that the Tasmania Health Service had not breached any laws or regulations. The court found in favour of the Tasmania Health Service and dismissed the case brought by J.
The final orders of the court were that the case brought by J against the Tasmania Health Service was dismissed and that the Tasmania Health Service was not required to take any further action. The court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties and was in accordance with the relevant legislation and regulations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.