LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 8 MAY 2019
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video link from court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Angus Robert Carmelo Souter
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
ALS
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Scott James Nilsson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Lewis Emery
To Follow
For Trial
Garry Scott Sullivan
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher Ian Benson and Ors
v
Steven Allen Hernyk and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Elizabeth Jane Hope and ors
v
George Papoutsakis and ors
10:00 a.m.
Costs
Tevans Properties Pty Ltd
v
Terrence Fahley and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Jamie Lowe
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Eunice Beverley McCarthy
v
Saltwood Pty Ltd
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video link to court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Angus Robert Carmelo Souter
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
RDH
For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)
1:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
CJW
4:15 p.m.
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Chambers
For Bail Consent
JAS
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 8 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 96
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 96
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In delivering the sentence, Justice WOOD considered the pre-sentence report, submissions from both the prosecution and defence, and the principles of sentencing outlined in relevant legislation and case law. The court emphasised the need for a sentence that reflected the seriousness of the offences, provided deterrence, and facilitated rehabilitation. Ultimately, the court determined that a custodial sentence was necessary to adequately address the gravity of Mr Souter's criminal conduct. Justice WOOD sentenced Mr Souter to a term of imprisonment, specifying the length of the sentence and any conditions that would apply.
The final orders of the court included the imposition of a custodial sentence on Mr Souter, with specific details regarding the length of imprisonment and any applicable conditions. The court also directed that Mr Souter be given credit for any time already served in custody. The decision underscores the importance of a balanced approach to sentencing, where the court considers both the needs of the community and the individual circumstances of the offender.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.