Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 6 March 2019 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 6 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Anthony Colin Finnegan
v
State of Tasmania

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Telephone
Bradley Scott Purkiss
Margaret Anne Otto

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m. not before 1:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
CAB

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
DNJ

For Bail Application
Joshua Robin Oakley

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
RJH
v
State of Tasmania

For Sentencing Submissions
Jacob Allan Daureen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Cameron Scott Clark
Ashton Mitchell Gill
Cody David Brown
Alan Kenneth King

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Questions of Law
Minister Administering the National Parks
and Reserve Management Act 2002
v
Eco-Geo International Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Finnegan v State of Tasmania [2019] TASCCA 13 is a case that came before the Court of Criminal Appeal in Tasmania on 6 March 2019. The appellant, Anthony Colin Finnegan, sought to appeal a decision made by a lower court, challenging the conviction or sentence imposed upon him. The nature of the appeal was not specified in the law list, and further details about the case, including the offence for which Finnegan was convicted, are not provided in the extract.

The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal would likely involve the examination of the lower court's decision in light of relevant laws, procedures, and principles of criminal justice. The appeal court would consider whether there were any errors in the proceedings or the application of the law that could have affected the outcome of the case. The appellant's legal team would have to argue that the conviction or sentence was unjust, and the appeal court would have to determine whether the appeal had merit.

The Court of Criminal Appeal, presided over by Chief Justice Blow, would have reviewed the case materials, heard arguments from both parties, and considered any relevant case law or legal principles. The court would then deliver its judgment, which could result in the appeal being upheld, dismissed, or potentially leading to a retrial or a reconsideration of the sentence. The outcome of the appeal would depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence.

The final orders of the Court of Criminal Appeal were not provided in the extract, and further information about the case would be required to understand the outcome of the appeal. The law list does not offer details about the decision made by the Court of Criminal Appeal in this matter.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 6 March 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established