Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 5 October 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 212


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 5 OCTOBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Thomas Gardam
v
WTH Pty Ltd t/as Avis Australia

Court 8, Salamanca Place 
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Jacob Christopher Picken

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Leonie Iris Kallend
v
Guardianship Administration Board

10:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Security for Costs
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and ors
(Part-Heard)

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Daniel Lee Upton

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention by Telephone
Nigel Burch
v
Douglas Parkinson and anor

10:00 a.m.
Dismiss Third Party Proceedings
Leo Custodians Pty Ltd
v
Donna Sommerville and ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 5 October 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 212
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 212
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a case involving Thomas Gardamv, who was acting on behalf of WTH Pty Ltd trading as Avis Australia. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the case list, but it was scheduled for a hearing before the full court. The court was tasked with resolving the legal issues that arose from this case. The second matter listed was a criminal jurisdiction case concerning Jacob Christopher Picken, who was scheduled for sentencing. The court had to determine the appropriate penalty for Picken's crime. The third matter involved Leonie Iris Kallen, who was scheduled for a directions hearing before the Guardianship Administration Board. The court was required to provide directions for the proceedings involving Kallen. The fourth matter was a security for costs case between Paul Francis Allison and Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and others. The court had to decide whether Allison was entitled to security for costs against the other parties.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not specified in the case list. The full court, which comprises three or more judges, heard the case of Thomas Gardamv and WTH Pty Ltd trading as Avis Australia. The reasoning and outcome of this case were not provided in the case list. In the criminal jurisdiction case involving Jacob Christopher Picken, the court was required to determine the appropriate penalty for Picken's crime. The outcome of this case was not specified in the case list. The directions hearing for Leonie Iris Kallen before the Guardianship Administration Board was scheduled for the same day. The court was required to provide directions for the proceedings involving Kallen. The outcome of this case was not specified in the case list. The security for costs case between Paul Francis Allison and Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and others was also scheduled for the same day. The court had to decide whether Allison was entitled to security for costs against the other parties. The outcome of this case was not specified in the case list.

No final orders were provided in the case list. The court's decisions on the cases involving Thomas Gardamv, Jacob Christopher Picken, Leonie Iris Kallen, and Paul Francis Allison were not specified in the case list. The outcomes of these cases would depend on the court's reasoning and the evidence presented during the hearings. The court's decisions would be communicated to the parties involved and could be appealed if necessary.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.