Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 5 February 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 62

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 5 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Todd Andrew Tatnell

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jakeb Alex George Dean v State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Legal Argument
Matthew John Davey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
4:15p.m.
For Bail Consent
Sean Peter Burk
Joseph Ado Juma

For Directions Hearing
Christopher Richard Stevenson
Darrel George Harington

For Decision
Jeffrey Ian Thompson

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00 am
Kate Jane Saliba v John Ferguson Vincent
Hearing/Originating Application – Admit Will
LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
KPM

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jesse John Joseph Stafford-Raimondo
(part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Plea
Peter Maxwell Hennessy

For Sentencing Submissions

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 5 February 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 62
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 62
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Wednesday, 5 February 2020, with multiple cases scheduled across various locations. In Hobart, at Court 8, Justice Estcourt presided over a trial involving Todd Andrew Tatnell, as well as a directions hearing for Jakeb Alex George Dean against the State of Tasmania. Meanwhile, at Court 1 in Hobart, Justice Brett handled a session of legal argument in the case of Matthew John Davey, followed by bail consent for Sean Peter Burk and Joseph Ado Juma, and a directions hearing for Christopher Richard Stevenson and Darrel George Harington. Associate Justice Holt, also in Hobart, presided over the hearing of an originating application for the admission of a will in the case of Kate Jane Saliba v John Ferguson Vincent. In Launceston, Justice Pearce handled a criminal trial at Court 1, while in Burnie, Chief Justice Blow managed a part-heard trial of Jesse John Joseph Stafford-Raimondo, a plea for Peter Maxwell Hennessy, and sentencing submissions.

The legal issues before the court ranged from criminal trials and directions hearings to legal arguments and applications for bail, admissions of wills, and sentencing submissions. Each case required the court to consider the specific facts and applicable laws relevant to the proceedings, ensuring that justice was administered appropriately according to legal principles.

The court's reasoning in each case would have been guided by relevant statutes, case law, and legal precedents. The outcome of each matter depended on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of legal standards. The court's decisions aimed to resolve the disputes fairly and in accordance with the law.

The final orders of the court, including any convictions, sentences, or rulings on applications, would be documented in the respective case records. These orders would reflect the court's determination of the legal issues and the outcomes of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.