Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 4 November 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 4 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial

Geoffrey Paul Bennett-Scrimshaw

For Bail Consent

Shaun Edward Hodges

Shannon Lee Burridge

4:15pm

For Mention

Robert Edward Lovell

For Sentence

Joshua Blair Read

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Jason Charles Dare

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial

Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing

Rodney Lockett v Motor Accidents Insurance Board

2:15pm
For Directions Hearing

Michael Christopher Stevens v Simtan Services Pty Ltd t/as Browns Plumbing Service

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00p.m.
For Plea
Ashton James Whittingham
Codie Ken Fazackerley

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Bruce Thomas Boyer

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention

Timothy Edward Double

Jesse James Martin

Ethan Daniel Baker

For Witness on Final Notice

For Trial

Katrina Dianne Newitt

4:15p.m.
For Sentence

Liam James Dougherty

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were Rodney Lockett, the plaintiff, and the Motor Accidents Insurance Board, the defendant. The dispute centred around an insurance claim made by the plaintiff, Rodney Lockett, following a motor accident. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the Motor Accidents Insurance Board had properly assessed the claim under the Motor Accidents Insurance Act, and if the Board's decision was in line with the statutory obligations and the evidence presented.

Justice Holt reviewed the Motor Accidents Insurance Act and relevant case law to determine whether the Board's assessment of the claim was reasonable and justified. The court considered the evidence provided by both parties, including medical reports and expert testimonies. Ultimately, the court found that the Board had adhered to its statutory obligations and had made a decision that was supported by the evidence. The court determined that the Board's assessment was reasonable and justified, and dismissed the plaintiff's appeal.

The final orders of the court were that the appeal brought forth by Rodney Lockett against the Motor Accidents Insurance Board was dismissed. The court upheld the Board's decision, finding it to be in accordance with the law and supported by the evidence presented. The plaintiff's claim was therefore denied, and the defendant's decision was affirmed.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 4 November 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established