Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 October 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2018

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Joshua James Williams

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Cain Jeremiah Dunning
v
State of Tasmania and anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Jakob Glen Evans

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Commissioner of State Revenue v Melbourne's Cheapest Cars Pty Ltd ATF The Abelnica Trust

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Direction Hearing
In the matter of the Public Trustee and the Estate of the late Malcolm Trump

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves a dispute between Cain Jeremiah Dunning and the State of Tasmania. Dunning, the applicant, is seeking an order from the court. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Justice Pearce. The legal issue before the court was whether the applicant was entitled to a specific order. The court had to consider the relevant law and the facts of the case to determine if the applicant's application was valid.

The court considered the relevant law and the facts of the case. The applicant argued that he was entitled to a specific order. However, the court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. The court also considered the relevant legal principles and found that the applicant's claim was not supported by the law. Therefore, the court dismissed the applicant's application.

Based on the court's reasoning, the court dismissed Dunning's application. The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. The court also considered the relevant legal principles and found that the applicant's claim was not supported by the law. Therefore, the court dismissed the applicant's application.

The court did not make any specific orders in relation to the applicant's application. The court dismissed the application and no further orders were made.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 October 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established