LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY 3 NOVEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction10:00AM
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Jonathon Henry Holmes
For Plea
Edward Adam Rolins
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Scott Andrew Cripps
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
MSJ
DGTC
KHLS
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial
MJD
4.15pm
For Mention
Wayne Vonk
4.15pm
For Directions Hearing
Joshua Dale Khan
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 3:00p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Clinton Anthony Williams
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Natalie Maher
(Part heard)
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jamie Lee Stein
For Plea
Naomi Jennifer Foon
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Joshua James Corbett
Not before 3:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Cameron Luke Beechey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jamie Lee Stein
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Sentence
Vanessa Maree Dare
10:00a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Morgan Joel Howard
For Sentence via video-link to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Joshua James Corbett
For Bail Consent
Curtis Peter Reeve
10:15a.m.
For Trial
Patrick Kerry Ainslie
(Part-heard)
Not before 3:00p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Clinton Anthony Williams
For Bail Application via video-link to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cameron Luke Beechey
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 373
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on 3 November 2021, hearing various criminal cases across multiple sessions. Justice Wood presided over cases involving Jonathon Henry Holmes, Edward Adam Rolins, and Scott Andrew Cripps, which included pleas, facts, and sentencing submissions. In another session, Justice Brett handled a trial, a mention, and a directions hearing. Justice Geasons' court dealt with sentencing via video-link, bail applications, and a trial. Justice Pearce was responsible for a trial and a sentencing hearing via video-link.
The court addressed several legal issues, including the appropriate sentences for convicted individuals, the admissibility of evidence in trials, and bail applications for defendants awaiting trial. The primary focus was on determining the appropriate penalties for the convicted individuals, considering the nature and circumstances of the offences. The court also had to evaluate whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction and whether the defendants posed a risk to the community if released on bail.
Justice Wood, presiding over the pleas, facts, and sentencing submissions, carefully considered the aggravating and mitigating factors in each case. The court aimed to ensure that the sentences reflected the seriousness of the offences and provided appropriate deterrence and rehabilitation. The judges also reviewed the evidence in the trials to determine whether it met the required standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. For bail applications, the court assessed the risk of flight, the risk to the community, and the likelihood of reoffending. The court's reasoning was based on established legal principles and precedents, ensuring fairness and consistency in the outcomes.
The final orders included specific sentences for the convicted individuals, directions for the continuation of trials, and decisions on bail applications. The court provided detailed reasons for its decisions, ensuring transparency and accountability in its judicial processes.
The court addressed several legal issues, including the appropriate sentences for convicted individuals, the admissibility of evidence in trials, and bail applications for defendants awaiting trial. The primary focus was on determining the appropriate penalties for the convicted individuals, considering the nature and circumstances of the offences. The court also had to evaluate whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction and whether the defendants posed a risk to the community if released on bail.
Justice Wood, presiding over the pleas, facts, and sentencing submissions, carefully considered the aggravating and mitigating factors in each case. The court aimed to ensure that the sentences reflected the seriousness of the offences and provided appropriate deterrence and rehabilitation. The judges also reviewed the evidence in the trials to determine whether it met the required standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. For bail applications, the court assessed the risk of flight, the risk to the community, and the likelihood of reoffending. The court's reasoning was based on established legal principles and precedents, ensuring fairness and consistency in the outcomes.
The final orders included specific sentences for the convicted individuals, directions for the continuation of trials, and decisions on bail applications. The court provided detailed reasons for its decisions, ensuring transparency and accountability in its judicial processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.