Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 August 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 158


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 3 AUGUST 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Adrian Patrick Farnell

4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Ashley Youth Detention Centre
JMDB

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joel Nicholas Wheeler

For Plea
Joel Matthew Maddox

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Wilfred Lopes Centre
Lokendra Singh

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Pre Trial Conference
Phillip Ripper and anor
v
Lee Tyers & Associates and anor

11:30 a.m.
Set Down for Trial
Gillian Lowth
v
Robert Lowth

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Liam Lawrence
v
Australiansuper Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Troy Wayne Murray

10:00am
For Mention via video link from Risdon Prison Complex
Luke James Reader

To Follow
For Mention
Christopher John Humphreys

4:15pm
For Sentence
Linda Lee Jones

4:30pm
For Mention via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Wilfred Lopes Centre
Lokendra Singh

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.    

For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex

Aaron John Brennan

For Mention

Dean Michael Rowe

For Trial

Saxon Graeme Jackson

(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 August 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 158
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 158
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Wednesday, 3 August 2016, with various criminal and civil matters scheduled across different courts in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. In the Hobart Court 7, presided over by Justice Wood, Rodney Matthew Klye and Jodie Diane Earley appeared for a part-heard trial, while Adrian Patrick Farnell was scheduled for sentencing. Joel Nicholas Wheeler appeared for a plea, and Joel Matthew Maddox for a mention. Associate Justice Holt presided over a civil pre-trial conference involving Phillip Ripper and others against Lee Tyers & Associates and others. Gillian Lowth was scheduled for a trial against Robert Lowth, and Liam Lawrence had a directions hearing by telephone against Australiansuper Pty Ltd. In Launceston, Justice Pearce handled several criminal matters, including a part-heard trial for Troy Wayne Murray, mentions for Luke James Reader and Linda Lee Jones, and a mention for Christopher John Humphreys via video link.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed a range of criminal proceedings, including trials, pleas, and sentencing, as well as a civil pre-trial conference and a directions hearing. For the criminal cases, the court had to address matters such as the admissibility of evidence, the application of sentencing principles, and the determination of guilt or innocence. The civil pre-trial conference likely involved discussions on case management, disclosure of documents, and the setting of a trial timetable. The directions hearing focused on procedural matters to guide the litigation process.

Justice Wood, Justice Pearce, and Associate Justice Holt, among others, presided over the hearings, applying the relevant legal frameworks to each case. The outcomes of these proceedings would depend on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of legal principles by the court. For criminal cases, the outcomes could include convictions, sentences, or dismissals, while in the civil matter, the outcome would likely pertain to the management and progression of the litigation.

No final orders were specified in the court list, and the outcomes of the cases would be determined during the respective hearings. The court's decisions would be based on the merits of each case, guided by statutory provisions, case law, and legal principles relevant to the matters at hand.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.