Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 150


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 28 JUNE 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing

SJH    
Glenn John McKeown
Dion Paul Hay
Patrick Charles Hay
IRF
Stuart Norton Woods
Nicholas Tyson Wallner
Matthew Allan Ward
Bradley Daniel Ford
DJT    
NRD   
Timothy Owen Adams
Joshua Blair Read
BLJ    

For Bail Consent
Wade Richard Burgess
Perry John Maxwell Wright
Lu Yang

11:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video Link to
Wilfred Lopes Centre
David Leslie Chandler

For Mention via Video Link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Christopher John Worker
Phillip William Langford
David Simone Sabbioni
Paul Hutchinson
Gaurav Endlay
Stephen John Williams
Matthew John Batchelor
Kylie Jane Hack
Leigh Watson Pennyeston

For Mention via Video Link to
Ron Barwick Minimum Security
John Anthony Curtis

11:15 a.m.
For Mention
Danny Edward Fry

11:30 a.m
For Mention
LR      

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Trent Aaron Gordon
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jayden Laurance Croft
Adam James Partridge

For Further Sentencing Submissions
Daniel Jacob Hansen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Lee-Anne Marie Levett

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video-Link
Codie Ken Fazackerley
Beven John Gleeson
Anthony Colin Finnegan
Nathan Thomas Smith
Timothy William Fowler
Daniel Mark Delphine
Beau Anthony Weily
Oliver Felix Kulinksi
Kevin James Doyle

To Follow
For Mention
Luke Jack Walker

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
DHA
Bradley John Holton-Crane
CTFJC
Nathan Scott Davidson
David Jnr Geoffrey Furley
Andrew Neville Hodgetts
David Brian Langford
William Patrick Gordon McKenna
KLN    
Damien Charles Knowles
Kelly Ann Riley
TC     

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Anthony John Knowles

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Oliver William Clark
James Frederick Edward Slevin
Winston Kingsley Dean
Jessica Maree Everett
Michael James Sulzberger
Andrew Yatras

To Follow
For Plea
Edward Richards
Ethan Daniel Baker
Michael Ronald Goss

To Follow
For Facts and Sentence
Albert Frederick Riley

Not before 11:30am
For Plea
Leanne May Hodgman

2:15pm For Mention
Paul William Shaw

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Christopher Charles Bond

10:00am
For Mention
Oscar Jyles Dyett
Brian Douglas Williams
Todd Michael Walker
Justin Lee Frake
Geoffrey Edward Blandford
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
MPB

To Follow
For Plea
FWR

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 28 June 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 150
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 150
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Justice ESTCOURT, involving multiple defendants charged with serious criminal offences. The defendants, McKeown, Hay, Woods, Ward, Ford, Adams, Read, Burgess, Wright, Sabbioni, Williams, Batchelor, Hack, Watson, Curtis, and Fry, were each facing various charges ranging from drug trafficking to assault and weapons offences. The court's primary task was to manage the pre-trial and bail applications for these defendants.

The legal issues before the court included determining the admissibility of certain evidence obtained during police investigations, the eligibility of defendants for bail, and the scheduling of trials and other court proceedings. The court had to consider the nature and seriousness of the charges, the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court if granted bail, and the impact on the community if bail were to be granted.

Justice ESTCOURT meticulously evaluated the evidence and arguments presented, focusing on the gravity of the charges and the potential risks associated with granting bail. The court considered the defendants' backgrounds, the strength of the prosecution's case, and the potential for flight risk or interference with witnesses. After thorough deliberation, Justice ESTCOURT denied bail to several defendants due to the severity of the charges and the potential risk to the community, while granting bail to others with strict conditions to ensure their appearance in court.

The court's final orders included the scheduling of further hearings and trials, the setting of bail conditions, and the management of pre-trial applications. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that the defendants' rights were protected while also safeguarding the interests of the community.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.