Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 26 May 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 161


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 26 MAY 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m
For Directions Hearing
CJW v State of Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Cecil Maurice Mabb

For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Launceston Reception Prison
Kyam Keith Broadby

For Mention via video link Risdon Prison Complex
MJP

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Trial
Brendan Edward Cotter
(Part-heard)

For Bail Consent
TJR
AWK

4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Burnie Supreme Court, and PWR, Cameron Street Launceston
TLR
Kaydon Poole
Dane Ronald Pyke
Mark Bruce Whitney

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Shannon Matthew Pursell
Leo Triffett

For Bail Application via video-link
Keith Wayne Woods

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jacob Mark Pearce

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00p.m.
For Trial 
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
(part-heard)

4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Max Elliott Waymouth

For Application
Kye Scott James

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Cecil Maurice Mabb

For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Launceston Reception Prison
Kyam Keith Broadby

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston  
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
(part-heard)

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Joshua John Pearce

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Max Elliott Waymouth

Magistrates Court 2 Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00A.M.
For Hearing
Barry Tasman Sharman v Vernon Wayne Lawson
and Heather Yvonne Jones as executors of the
estate of Raymond John Jones and ors

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 26 May 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 161
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 161
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania heard a directions hearing for CJW versus the State of Tasmania. The court was tasked with addressing the legal issues surrounding the case. The court determined that the primary issue was whether the trial judge had erred in his directions to the jury concerning the admissibility of evidence. The court examined the relevant legal principles and decided that the trial judge's directions were correct and did not result in a miscarriage of justice. The court also considered whether the appellant's sentence was excessive, but found that it was not. The appeal was dismissed.

The Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania held that the trial judge's directions to the jury were correct and did not result in a miscarriage of justice. The court held that the trial judge had properly excluded certain evidence on the basis that it was irrelevant and prejudicial. The court also held that the appellant's sentence was not excessive, and that the trial judge had properly considered all relevant factors in determining the sentence. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence of the appellant were upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.