LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 25 JULY 2018
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Eleni Koulmandas
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Basha Inquiry
JAK
11:30 a.m.
For Trial
JAK
2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
AGD
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence by Video Link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NHJR
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Christopher Craig Banks
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Michael Clark
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jay Holloway
Joshua Paul Lethborg
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Christopher Craig Banks
To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Beau Anthony Weily
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence by Video Link
from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NHJR
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Brody Mykel Maisey
To Follow
For Trial
RNS
4:15p.m.
For Sentence via Video Link to RPC,
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
NHJR
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 25 July 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 464
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 464
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice WOOD addressed the procedural aspects of the case by providing clear directives on the scheduling and management of the upcoming hearing. The court took into consideration the complexity of the case, the need for adequate preparation by both the prosecution and the defence, and the rights of the defendant to a fair trial. The decision included instructions on the admissibility of specific evidence, the timing of the hearing, and the logistics of ensuring all parties were adequately prepared. The court's reasoning was grounded in ensuring that the trial would proceed in an orderly and just manner, adhering to the principles of fairness and procedural correctness.
As a result of the court's deliberation, specific directions were issued to the parties involved, outlining the steps to be taken in preparation for the trial. The court also made orders regarding the admissibility of certain pieces of evidence, ensuring that only relevant and properly obtained evidence would be considered. The final outcome was that the directions hearing was scheduled to proceed, with clear instructions provided to the parties to ensure compliance with the court's directives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.