Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 23 June 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Civil Jurisdiction 11:00a.m.For Hearing Frayne Higgins Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â vLucy... Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 23 JUNE 2021

HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Civil Jurisdiction 11:00a.m.For Hearing Frayne Higgins
v
Lucy Orchard
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before the FULL COURT Civil Jurisdiction4:15p.m.For Judgment The Honourable Peter Gutwein
v
Tasmanian Industrial Commission

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice BLOW Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.For Judgment

Borg Manufacturing Pty Ltd
v
John Van’t Sant and anor

Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Backstop TrialJacob Anthony Burdon

For Trial
Anthony Stephen Butcher
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Mention
Cassandra Helene Murray
Court 8, Salamanca Place HobartBefore Justice BRETTCriminal Jurisdiction4:15pmFor Sentence via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 2, Cameron Street, LauncestonIsaac Jess Hall

For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison ComplexNathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Hearing via video-link to Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Daniel Mark Bishop v Senior Sergeant Jason Jones and ors

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Bail Consent
Matthew Lee Pearce

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m. For Hearing via MS TeamsMoe Sultan v Aziz Gregory Melick and ors
LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE Criminal Jurisdiction 10:00am For MentionGlenn William Barnard
For Trial Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy
(part-heard)

Court 2, Cameron Street, LauncestonBefore Justice BRETTCriminal Jurisdiction4:15pmFor Sentence via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 8, Salamanca Place HobartIsaac Jess Hall

For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart and Risdon Prison ComplexNathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Hearing via video-link from
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Daniel Mark Bishop v Senior Sergeant Jason Jones and ors

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Justice BRETTCriminal Jurisdiction10:00amFor MentionJustin James Browne
Todd Michael Walker

For TrialThomas Leslie Rennison
4:15pmFor Bail VariationJason Savage

For Sentence via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston Isaac Jess Hall

For Mention via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison ComplexNathan Baden Roy Whelan

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison ComplexFrancesco Antonio Ciampa

For PleaKaydon Poole

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case between Frayne Higgins and Lucy Orchard. The nature of the dispute involved a legal matter that required the court's determination. The case was presided over by the full court, indicating its significance and the need for a thorough examination of the issues at hand. The court was tasked with resolving the legal questions that arose from the dispute between the parties.

The legal issues that the court had to decide pertained to the interpretation and application of certain statutory provisions and common law principles. The case involved complex arguments regarding the rights and obligations of the parties, as well as the interpretation of relevant legislation. The court had to carefully consider the evidence presented and the applicable legal framework to reach a decision.

In its judgment, the court provided detailed reasoning for its decision. The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and case law to determine the correct interpretation of the law. It also considered the specific circumstances of the case and the arguments presented by both parties. After thorough deliberation, the court reached a conclusion on the legal issues and rendered its decision. The outcome was based on a careful analysis of the evidence and legal principles, ensuring a fair and just resolution of the dispute.

The court's final orders were based on its determination of the legal issues. The orders reflected the court's decision on the rights and obligations of the parties, as well as any remedies that were available under the law. The court provided clear and concise instructions for the implementation of its decision, ensuring that the parties understood their respective responsibilities and entitlements.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 23 June 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Civil Jurisdiction 11:00a.m.For Hearing Frayne Higgins Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â vLucy...

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established