LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Joshua Dillon Astell
Adrian Michael Flounders
Jake Mark Pearce
Jorden Bird
For Trial
Michael Dennis Briers
(part-heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kurt Anthony Lowe
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For directions hearing
LHC
For return of surety
Re Ryan Edward Brown
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Hasley James Maynard
For Plea
Jacob Eric Lonergan
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kurt Anthony Lowe
For Sentence
Tyler Jeremy Angel
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
John William Milligan
For Trial
JAR
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Adye John Wells
For Sentencing Submissions
Brian Sheals
For Sentence
Riley Jason Causon
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 319
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Joshua Dillon Astell, Adrian Michael Flounders, Jake Mark Pearce and Jorden Bird appeared in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Chief Justice Blow for a directions hearing. The nature of the dispute was related to criminal jurisdiction matters. The court was required to determine various legal issues including the scheduling of the trial, allocation of resources, and procedural directions. The primary focus was on ensuring that the upcoming trial would be conducted in an efficient and fair manner, addressing any logistical and legal challenges that might arise.
The Chief Justice carefully considered the evidence and submissions from both the prosecution and the defence. The court examined the complexities of the case, the availability of witnesses, and the need for any special accommodations. The legal team for both sides were given an opportunity to outline their respective positions and address any preliminary issues that could impact the trial. The Chief Justice provided clear directions for the parties to follow, ensuring that all necessary preparations were made to proceed with the trial in an orderly fashion.
The court ruled that the trial would proceed as scheduled, with specific directives on the management of evidence, witness testimonies, and other procedural aspects. The Chief Justice emphasized the importance of adhering to the directions provided to ensure a fair trial. The court also set aside time for further discussions and clarifications if any issues arose during the trial preparations.
The final orders included the scheduling of the trial, the allocation of resources for the proceedings, and specific instructions for both parties to ensure that all preparatory work was completed in a timely manner. The court ensured that all parties were aware of their responsibilities and the deadlines they needed to meet.
The Chief Justice carefully considered the evidence and submissions from both the prosecution and the defence. The court examined the complexities of the case, the availability of witnesses, and the need for any special accommodations. The legal team for both sides were given an opportunity to outline their respective positions and address any preliminary issues that could impact the trial. The Chief Justice provided clear directions for the parties to follow, ensuring that all necessary preparations were made to proceed with the trial in an orderly fashion.
The court ruled that the trial would proceed as scheduled, with specific directives on the management of evidence, witness testimonies, and other procedural aspects. The Chief Justice emphasized the importance of adhering to the directions provided to ensure a fair trial. The court also set aside time for further discussions and clarifications if any issues arose during the trial preparations.
The final orders included the scheduling of the trial, the allocation of resources for the proceedings, and specific instructions for both parties to ensure that all preparatory work was completed in a timely manner. The court ensured that all parties were aware of their responsibilities and the deadlines they needed to meet.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.