LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 22 AUGUST 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Aaron John Cleaver
v
State of Tasmania
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Peter Jeffrey Rose
For Directions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters v State of Tasmania
For Directions Hearing
DJT
v
State of Tasmania
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30 a.m.
For Decision via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lorraine Elizabeth Jordan
v
Criminal Injuries Compensation Commission – Commissioner F Neasey
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Matthew Clifford Hingston
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Matthew Clifford Hingston
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Robert Leigh Cowen
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions hearing
Gunns Limited and ors
v
KPMG and ors
Gunns Limited and ors
v
Christopher James Newton and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30am For Decision via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lorraine Elizabeth Jordan
v
Criminal Injuries Compensation Commission – Commissioner F Neasey
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew Clifford Hingston
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 22 August 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 489
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 489
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning in this case focused on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, the application of legal principles during the trial, and the proportionality of the sentence. The Chief Justice considered whether the lower court had correctly interpreted the law, whether the appellant's rights were properly safeguarded, and if the sentence was just and appropriate given the nature of the offences and the appellant's background. After a thorough review, the court found that the evidence was sufficient to uphold the conviction and that no procedural errors had occurred that would warrant a different outcome. The Chief Justice also determined that the sentence was appropriate and proportionate to the crimes committed.
As a result of the court's decision, the appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence as determined by the lower court were upheld. The final orders of the court confirmed the appellant's conviction on all counts and the sentence previously imposed. This decision ensures that the lower court's judgment stands, and the appellant will continue to serve his sentence as determined.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.