Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 21 October 2020 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 21 OCTOBER 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT OF APPEAL
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15am
For Decision
Tasmania Health Service v JW

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Damian Leslie Harper

PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee

For Bail Application via Video Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Christopher Leigh Brown

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Aaron Dean Eaves
Kai Kimmo Juvakka

For Trial
Joshua Blair Read

2:00pm
For Sentencing
Benjamin John Howlett

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Matthew Joseph Piggott
Johnny David Jones

For Bail Consent
Jemma Rumley-Cantrell

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Russon

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

10:00 am
Linda Catherine Johnston v The Lost Dogs’ Home (ACN 0047 89726) and anor
Hearing – Originating Application

11:00 am
Adrian Lacroix v Peter Dennis Auksorius and ors
Directions Hearing

12 noon
Judith Rose BARBER v Joy Elizabeth BARBER as executrix of the Estate of the late Rex Ernest Barber
Costs

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Michael Peter Lee James Blake

For Trial
AWB

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee

Directions Hearing
Michael John Salter

For Bail Application via Video Link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Christopher Leigh Brown

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing
Bradley Frank Richards

For Trial
P G T

12:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 7, Hobart
Damian Leslie Harper

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tasmania Health Service v JW was heard before the Full Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the case title, but it likely involved a health-related matter between the Tasmania Health Service and the individual identified as JW. The court was tasked with resolving any legal issues arising from the interaction between the health service and JW. The specific legal issues that the court had to decide were not detailed in the provided case title, but they would have pertained to the dispute between the parties. The reasoning and outcome of the court's decision were not provided in the case title, so it is unclear what the court's decision was or how they arrived at it. Given the nature of the case, it is likely that the court considered various legal principles and precedents relevant to health services and individual rights. The final orders of the court were not stated in the case title, so it is not possible to know what the court ordered as a result of their decision.

The court's reasoning and outcome in the case were not explicitly stated in the case title, but it is likely that the Full Court of Appeal thoroughly examined the legal issues presented by the parties. The court would have considered relevant laws, regulations, and precedents to arrive at a decision. The outcome of the case would have been based on the court's interpretation of the law and its application to the specific circumstances of the case. Given the nature of the case, the court's decision could have had significant implications for both the Tasmania Health Service and JW, potentially affecting their legal rights and obligations. The final orders of the court would have been based on their decision and would have outlined the specific outcomes for the parties involved.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 21 October 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established