Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 21 July 2021 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 21 JULY 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Costs
Jacqueline Louise King
v
Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson and Ors

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Budde Mitchell Byrne
Thomas Phillip Triffett
Aarif Billah Eldaleh
David Jeffrey Burridge

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander St, Burnie
Lachlan Taylor

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Willian John Christopher Mc Fardzean FORAN
For directions hearing
JMT

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument via video link PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
MJW

4:15pm
For Sentence
TJR

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison and PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Heath Lance Chatters

For Mention
Dean Phillip Braslin

For Bail Consent
Kaydon Poole

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
11am
For Hearing
Roman Catholic Church Trust Corporation of the Archdiocese of Hobart T/as St Anthony’s Catholic School
v
Vanessa Lee Prosser

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Philip James Airey

For Sentencing Submissions
Matthew Lee Pearce

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
11:00a.m.
For Hearing (Administrators Directions)
SULTAN v Melick and ors

LAUNCESTON

PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument via video link PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MJW
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Dane Andrew Clark
(Part-heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander St, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For sentence via video-link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lachlan Taylor

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Cameron Donald O’Leary
John Anthony Wilkinson

10:00am
For Trial
MBR

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument via video link PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston and Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MJW

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a number of cases on 21 July 2021. One of the cases was Jacqueline Louise King versus Neil Patrick Bigg as personal representative of the estate of the late Stephen James Atkinson and others. The case was heard in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart before Chief Justice Blow. The nature of the dispute was for costs. The court was required to decide on the legal issues surrounding the costs incurred by the plaintiff in the case.

The court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties and provided its reasoning and outcome. The court found in favour of the defendant and ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of the defendant. The court also ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of the defendant's legal representatives. The court provided its detailed reasoning for the decision and the outcome was that the plaintiff was ordered to pay the costs of the defendant and the defendant's legal representatives.

The final orders of the court were that the plaintiff pay the costs of the defendant and the defendant's legal representatives. The court's decision was based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties and the court's interpretation of the law. The outcome of the case was that the plaintiff was ordered to pay the costs of the defendant and the defendant's legal representatives. This decision is binding on both parties and they are required to comply with the court's orders.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 21 July 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established