LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 21 APRIL 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
Cambria Green Agriculture & Tourism Management Pty Ltd and ors
v
The Honourable Elise Archer Attorney-General for Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters
For Directions Hearing
PT
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Aaron James Irwin
(part-heard)
4:00p.m.
Re Barry James Ambrose Cook: Application by Surety
For Sentence via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Barry James Ambrose Cook
To Follow
For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Nicholas Paul Burns
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
C5 Pro-Solutions Pty Ltd v Stephen Abbott and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 115
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Cambria Green Agriculture and Tourism Management Pty Ltd, along with other parties, faced a legal dispute against the Honourable Elise Archer, in her capacity as the Attorney-General for Tasmania. The matter was heard by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute involved complex issues related to statutory interpretation and the application of specific legislative provisions.
The primary legal issues the court was tasked with deciding involved the interpretation of certain sections within the relevant legislation and whether these sections were applicable to the facts of the case. The court also needed to consider whether the actions of the Attorney-General were within the bounds of the law and if any statutory provisions were violated.
The Full Court carefully examined the relevant statutes and considered the arguments presented by both parties. After thorough deliberation, the court found that the interpretation of the legislative provisions aligned with the arguments made by the Attorney-General. The court concluded that the actions taken by the Attorney-General were in accordance with the law and did not contravene any statutory provisions. Therefore, the Full Court dismissed the claims brought forth by Cambria Green Agriculture and Tourism Management Pty Ltd and the other parties.
The primary legal issues the court was tasked with deciding involved the interpretation of certain sections within the relevant legislation and whether these sections were applicable to the facts of the case. The court also needed to consider whether the actions of the Attorney-General were within the bounds of the law and if any statutory provisions were violated.
The Full Court carefully examined the relevant statutes and considered the arguments presented by both parties. After thorough deliberation, the court found that the interpretation of the legislative provisions aligned with the arguments made by the Attorney-General. The court concluded that the actions taken by the Attorney-General were in accordance with the law and did not contravene any statutory provisions. Therefore, the Full Court dismissed the claims brought forth by Cambria Green Agriculture and Tourism Management Pty Ltd and the other parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.