LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 2 DECEMBER 2020
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing
Wayne Gregory Pattison
Shannon Lee Burridge
S P H
D J B
N M H
For Sentencing Submissions
Belinda Elizabeth Dobson
Mark William Ransley
For Plea
Cassandra Helene Murray
Amber Jessica Royer
Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield
12:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing
Damien Leslie Harper
2:15 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
C J D
3:00 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
M S L
PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
SDH Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Legal Profession Board v WFL
(Part-heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Scott Andrew Francis Jones
Judith Maree Jones
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
and Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Alesha Prentice
Corey James Wordsworth
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
APA
Aaron Dean Eaves
Aaron Charles McShane
Not before 3:00p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Mark Parkinson
Jye Cowen
Tony Matthew White
4:00p.m.
For Bail Application
Floyd Mansfield
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
11:00a.m.
For Hearing via video link to Cameron Street, Launceston
Director of Public Prosecutions v Shane Peter GILL and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel James Crisp
For Trial
Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy
(part-heard)
Court 1 Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video link from Court 8,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Risdon Prison Complex
Alesha Prentice
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m
For Trial
AGM
(part-heard)
10:00a.m
For Mention via video-link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Jake John Sushames
For Mention
Dane Ronald Pyke
Mitchell Robert Flannagan
4:15pm
For Mention to Hobart PWR, Salamanca Place
SDH
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1133
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, several matters were heard by various judges on 2 December 2020. One matter involved a directions hearing for Wayne Gregory Pattison and Shannon Lee Burridge, heard in Court 8 by Justice Wood. Another matter involved a plea hearing for Belinda Elizabeth Dobson and Mark William Ransley, also heard by Justice Wood. A further matter involved a directions hearing for Damien Leslie Harper, heard by Justice Pearce in Burnie via video link.
The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate directions for each case, ensuring that all parties were aware of the proceedings, and facilitating the efficient and fair administration of justice. The court had to consider the specific circumstances of each case, including the charges, the evidence, and the rights of the accused.
Justice Wood and Justice Pearce provided detailed directions for the respective cases, outlining the next steps and setting timelines for the proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that all parties were aware of their rights and the process, and that the proceedings were conducted fairly and efficiently.
The court made orders for each case, including directions for the parties to prepare for the next hearing and to exchange evidence. The court also set timelines for the proceedings, ensuring that the cases were heard in a timely manner. The orders reflected the court's commitment to ensuring that justice was served in an efficient and effective manner.
The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate directions for each case, ensuring that all parties were aware of the proceedings, and facilitating the efficient and fair administration of justice. The court had to consider the specific circumstances of each case, including the charges, the evidence, and the rights of the accused.
Justice Wood and Justice Pearce provided detailed directions for the respective cases, outlining the next steps and setting timelines for the proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that all parties were aware of their rights and the process, and that the proceedings were conducted fairly and efficiently.
The court made orders for each case, including directions for the parties to prepare for the next hearing and to exchange evidence. The court also set timelines for the proceedings, ensuring that the cases were heard in a timely manner. The orders reflected the court's commitment to ensuring that justice was served in an efficient and effective manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.