LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 19 JUNE 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
BP
(part-heard) Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Rodney Gene Crosswell
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie and to Hobart Reception Prison
Anthony Paul SmithFor Application to Vary Bail from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie
Jarod Lee Kringle
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Emery
For Bail Variation
Wade Alan Mackenzie
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Carley Anne Watkins
Leigh Reginald Dobson
Samuel James Franklin
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10.15am
John Raymond Downham
v John Doerr Marshall
Assessment of Damages (cont)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Backstop Trial
Dennis Colin Coleman
For Trial
Mark Rodney Jones
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
JBA
(Part-Heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
James Brian Laskey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Trent James Jones
For Trial
Matthew Paul O’Brien
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Hobart Reception Prison
Anthony Paul Smith
For Application to Vary Bail to Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jarod Lee Kringle
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 19 June 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 125
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 125
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied, ranging from directions hearings to bail applications and sentencing. In the directions hearing for Rodney Gene Crosswell, the court likely considered the procedural steps to be taken in the case. Alexander Paul Smith's sentencing involved the determination of an appropriate punishment based on the evidence presented. Jarod Lee Kringle's bail variation application required the court to assess whether the current bail conditions should be altered. In Dennis Colin Coleman's trial, the court had to decide on the defendant's guilt or innocence based on the evidence. The disputed facts hearing for Mark Rodney Jones involved resolving specific issues in contention within the case. Lastly, the pleas and sentencing of Trent James Jones and Matthew Paul O'Brien required the court to consider the circumstances of the crimes and the appropriate penalties.
The reasoning and outcome of each case were determined by the specific facts and legal arguments presented. Rodney Gene Crosswell's directions hearing likely resulted in a plan for the case's progression. Alexander Paul Smith's sentencing took into account the severity of the crime and mitigating or aggravating factors. Jarod Lee Kringle's bail variation application was assessed based on changes in circumstances or new information. Dennis Colin Coleman's trial concluded with a verdict, and the disputed facts hearing for Mark Rodney Jones resolved the contested issues. Trent James Jones's plea and Matthew Paul O'Brien's sentencing were based on the legal framework and the evidence presented.
The final orders for each case were tailored to the specific circumstances. Rodney Gene Crosswell's case likely received instructions for further proceedings. Alexander Paul Smith was sentenced and transferred to Hobart Reception Prison. Jarod Lee Kringle's bail variation application was either granted or denied. Dennis Colin Coleman's trial resulted in a verdict, and Mark Rodney Jones's disputed facts hearing resolved the contested issues. Trent James Jones's plea was recorded, and Matthew Paul O'Brien was sentenced and transferred to Hobart Reception Prison.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.