Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 17 February 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 40


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 17 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
4:00 p.m
For Judgment
Dennis Stephen Coad v State of Tasmania


Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m
For Sentence
T W

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentence
Dallas John Eaves

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Joshua Michael Murtagh


LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones
(part-heard)

10:00am
For Directions Hearing
Health Maxwell Lethborg

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Hossain Ashrafi
Fatima Ayoubi

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
LJDH

For Bail Consent
Shaun Albert Leonard

For Trial
RAS

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday 17 February 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 40
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 40
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the Full Court presided over a number of cases on Wednesday, 17 February 2021. One such case was Dennis Stephen Coad v State of Tasmania, which was heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The matter involved a criminal jurisdiction dispute between the plaintiff, Dennis Stephen Coad, and the defendant, the State of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute and the specific details of the case are not provided in the text.

The legal issues before the court in this case were not explicitly stated in the text. However, given the context of the case being heard in a criminal jurisdiction court, it is likely that the court was required to determine whether the defendant's actions constituted a criminal offence under Tasmanian law. This may have involved examining the relevant statutes and case law to establish the legal principles that applied to the case.

The text does not provide information on the court's reasoning or outcome in the case. It is possible that the case was resolved through a settlement or that the court issued a written judgment at a later date. Without further information, it is not possible to provide a detailed analysis of the court's decision.

If the court made any final orders in the case, they are not provided in the text. It is possible that the court issued orders related to the disposal of the case, the payment of costs, or any other matters that arose during the proceedings. Again, without further information, it is not possible to provide details on any final orders made by the court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.