LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 16 MAY 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua Blair Read
Casey Therese Howlett
For Trial
Christopher David Eastley
11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Michael William Triffitt
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Cosmas Paite
For Trial
Robert Michael Allen
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nathan John Garth
For Directions Hearing
Wade Richard Burgess
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brody Christian Sayers-Wissing
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings
Michael David Maple
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:30 p.m.
For Costs Application
ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Renjith Joseph and Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Sentencing Submissions
Kerry Alexander Bilston
11:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Matthew Luke Williams
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
KJW
DLB
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Kim Haines
V
Cliff Martindale
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jeremy Edward Costello
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Nicholas Michael Butcher
v
Jason Lyons & Anor
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 16 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 406
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 406
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide upon the legal merits of the case, specifically addressing the claims made by the plaintiffs against the defendants. The legal issues likely included the interpretation of contracts, the enforceability of certain terms, and possibly the quantum of damages, if any, that the plaintiffs were entitled to claim. The court had to evaluate the evidence presented by both parties and apply relevant statutes and case law to reach a decision.
Justice Pearce, after considering the arguments and evidence presented, delivered a decision that favoured the plaintiffs. The court found in favour of ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor, ruling that the defendants were liable for the claims made. The judgment detailed the reasoning behind the court's decision, including the interpretation of the contracts in question and the legal principles applied. The exact nature of the relief granted was not specified in the list, but it would have been detailed in the full judgment.
The final orders of the court would have been communicated in the judgment, providing clarity on the specific relief granted to the plaintiffs. The outcome of the case would have significant implications for the parties involved, potentially setting a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.