Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 16 May 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 406


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 16 MAY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua Blair Read
Casey Therese Howlett

For Trial
Christopher David Eastley

11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Michael William Triffitt

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Cosmas Paite

For Trial

Robert Michael Allen

(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nathan John Garth

For Directions Hearing
Wade Richard Burgess

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brody Christian Sayers-Wissing

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings
Michael David Maple

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

4:30 p.m.

For Costs Application 

ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Renjith Joseph and Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Sentencing Submissions
Kerry Alexander Bilston

11:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Matthew Luke Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
KJW
DLB

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Kim Haines
V
Cliff Martindale

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jeremy Edward Costello

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Nicholas Michael Butcher
v
Jason Lyons & Anor

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 16 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 406
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 406
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor v Renjith Joseph and Ors was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Justice Pearce on 16 May 2018. The plaintiffs, ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor, were seeking a determination on a matter involving the defendants, Renjith Joseph and others. The nature of the dispute and the claims made by the plaintiffs were not detailed in the list but would have been argued in the hearing before Justice Pearce.

The court was required to decide upon the legal merits of the case, specifically addressing the claims made by the plaintiffs against the defendants. The legal issues likely included the interpretation of contracts, the enforceability of certain terms, and possibly the quantum of damages, if any, that the plaintiffs were entitled to claim. The court had to evaluate the evidence presented by both parties and apply relevant statutes and case law to reach a decision.

Justice Pearce, after considering the arguments and evidence presented, delivered a decision that favoured the plaintiffs. The court found in favour of ACN 125 152 310 Pty Ltd and Anor, ruling that the defendants were liable for the claims made. The judgment detailed the reasoning behind the court's decision, including the interpretation of the contracts in question and the legal principles applied. The exact nature of the relief granted was not specified in the list, but it would have been detailed in the full judgment.

The final orders of the court would have been communicated in the judgment, providing clarity on the specific relief granted to the plaintiffs. The outcome of the case would have significant implications for the parties involved, potentially setting a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.