LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 16 AUGUST 2017
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Ben Bryan Nichols
James Anthony Gordon
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Hayley Margaret Webster
v
The State of Tasmania
The State of Tasmania
v
Hayley Margaret Webster
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
LBS
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Continuation of Sentencing Submissions via Video Link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Heath Lance Chatters
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher Cottam Wait,
Matthew Cameron O’Connell
Jonathan Ernest O’Connell
v
Marcia Jane Millard
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Jeanette Cawthen,
the Trustee of the property of
Jeanette Greta Cawthen
v
Stewart Brian Cawthen
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Carly Ann Dekkers
Christopher John Humphreys
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Caine Robert Richardson
Sean Gregory Richardson
Matthew Luke Williams
4:15pm For Mention
Codie Ken Fazackerley
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
via Video Link from Court 8,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Continuation of Sentencing Submissions
Heath Lance Chatters
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 16 August 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 186
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 186
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning and outcome are not explicitly stated in the court list. However, the fact that the matter was heard before Justice Estcourt suggests that it was a significant case that required the attention of a senior judge. It is possible that the court made findings on the legal issues that were raised and delivered a judgment that resolved the dispute between the parties.
The final orders of the court are not stated in the court list. It is possible that the court made orders that were recorded in a written judgment or that the parties reached an agreement that was recorded in a consent order. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the outcome of the case or the orders that were made by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.