LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 15 MARCH 2017
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Allan Ward
Edward John Canning
For Trial
Kyle Rix Stephens
4:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stephen John Edwards
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Garry James Brodie
For Trial
William Henry Richardson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart via Video Link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
NAT
For Facts and Sentence
Dane Joseph Lojek
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Andrew Eric Roach
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston via Video Link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
4:00pm For Plea in Mitigation
NAT
To Follow
For Facts and Sentence
Dane Joseph Lojek
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Acting Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application to Change Plea
Heath Lance Chatters
4:00 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Brereton James Jones
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 15 March 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 57
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 57
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied, encompassing matters of mention, trial, application to change plea, and preliminary proceedings. Each case required the court to address specific procedural and substantive legal questions pertinent to the particular facts and charges of each defendant. This included determining the admissibility of evidence, the appropriateness of sentences, and the legal standards applicable to the charges.
The court's reasoning was directed towards ensuring that each defendant received a fair hearing, that the evidence presented was admissible and sufficient to meet legal standards, and that any applications or pleas were properly considered. Justice Tennent, Justice Estcourt, and Justice Brett each applied the relevant legal principles to the facts of their respective cases, making findings and decisions that were documented in the court's records. The outcomes of these hearings would have provided direction for subsequent stages of the legal process for each defendant.
The final orders of the court, while not detailed in the text, would have included directions for further proceedings, rulings on applications, and any immediate decisions on sentencing or pleas. These outcomes would have been communicated to the parties and recorded in the court's official records.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.