Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday 14 October, 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1069


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY 14 OCTOBER, 2020


HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Jacob Anthony Burdon

For Plea
Benjamin John Howlett

2:15pm
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Kye John Edward Charles Louney

4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Rory Mitchell Shipton-Gaiter

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Patrick Kenneth Dolbey
(Part-heard)

For Bail Application via to Risdon Prison Complex
Sydney Voss


Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard


Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Set Aside Writ/Service of Writ
Karalyn Courtney v State of Tasmania and ors


LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Ernest Denman

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Scott Deane Radin


Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Rory Mitchell Shipton-Gaiter

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex and from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Patrick Kenneth Dolbey
(Part-heard)


BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Trial
P G T

4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing
J L H

For Facts and Sentence

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday 14 October, 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1069
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 1069
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various criminal matters on Wednesday, 14 October 2020. Notable cases included a plea hearing for Jacob Anthony Burdon, a bail application for Kye John Edward Charles Louney, and a bail application for Patrick Kenneth Dolbey. Each of these cases involved different legal issues and outcomes.

The court was required to decide on the appropriate legal procedures and outcomes for each case. In the case of Burdon, the court needed to determine whether the plea entered was valid and if the accused was fit to plead. For Louney, the court had to assess the risk factors and decide if bail was warranted. In the case of Dolbey, the court needed to weigh the risk factors against the interests of justice to determine whether bail should be granted.

Justice Brett presided over the bail application for Louney and Dolbey. The court found Louney to be a flight risk and denied bail. Dolbey's application was adjourned for further consideration. The court's decisions were based on the specific circumstances of each case, including the nature of the offence, the risk of flight, and the interests of justice.

No final orders were made in the cases of Louney and Dolbey, as their applications were either denied or adjourned. In the case of Burdon, the court accepted the plea, and the matter was to proceed to sentencing. The court's decisions reflect the importance of balancing individual rights with public safety in criminal proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.