LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 14 APRIL 2021
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
William Eric Yabsley
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
AGM Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel John Ernest Dadson
For Mention
James Stephen William Russon
Christopher Mac Hatty
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Bryce Robert Richardson
Francesco Antonio Ciampa
For Bail Application
SPM
2:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Sophie Michelle Lynch
For Bail Application via video-link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew Allan Ward
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Aaron James Irwin
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via video link to Alexander Street, Burnie
For Hearing
Jason Lee Ronksley and anor
v French’s Building Services Pty Ltd and ors
LAUNCESTON
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:00pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link
from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Cecil Maurice Mabb
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
John David Clinton
(Part-heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Shane Leonard George
For Bail Consent
Shane Anthony Watson
Shane Christopher Blair
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Directions Hearing by telephone
Selina Rush
v
Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal and anor
10:00am
For Hearing
Andrew Michael Turner
v
Melina Horan
12:00pm
For Stay Application
Elza Matheson
v
Housing Choices Tasmania
2:15pm
For Decision
Nemanja Mrgic
v
Senior Sergeant Russell Judges
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
AGM
3:00pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link to PWR,
Cameron Street, Launceston and Launceston Reception Prison
Cecil Maurice Mabb
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew Allan Ward
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via video link from
Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
For Hearing
Jason Lee Ronksley and anor
v French’s Building Services Pty Ltd and ors
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 108
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of William Eric Yabsley was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 14 April 2021. The nature of the dispute was a directions hearing. The court was presided over by Justice PEARCE in Court 2, located at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The primary legal issue the court was required to address was the scheduling and direction of the case, including setting timelines and procedural steps moving forward.
The court examined the procedural fairness and the need to ensure that the case progresses in an efficient and timely manner. Justice PEARCE considered the submissions from both parties, weighed the urgency and complexity of the case, and determined the appropriate steps to be taken next. The court's reasoning focused on balancing the rights of the defendant with the need for a fair and expeditious trial.
The outcome of the hearing was the issuance of specific directions for the case, including setting dates for further hearings and specifying procedural requirements. The court ordered that certain documents be filed by specific deadlines and scheduled subsequent hearings to monitor the progress of the case. The final orders were communicated to both parties, ensuring clarity and compliance with the court's directives.
The court examined the procedural fairness and the need to ensure that the case progresses in an efficient and timely manner. Justice PEARCE considered the submissions from both parties, weighed the urgency and complexity of the case, and determined the appropriate steps to be taken next. The court's reasoning focused on balancing the rights of the defendant with the need for a fair and expeditious trial.
The outcome of the hearing was the issuance of specific directions for the case, including setting dates for further hearings and specifying procedural requirements. The court ordered that certain documents be filed by specific deadlines and scheduled subsequent hearings to monitor the progress of the case. The final orders were communicated to both parties, ensuring clarity and compliance with the court's directives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.