Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 13 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 13
SEPTEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Cosmas Paite

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Stuart Norton Woods
(Part Heard)

2:15 p.m.
A Witness
Kristie Lee Graham

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Chris Boland
v
Legal Profession Board and ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Groove On Productions Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Turner Scott Family Trust and anor
v
ACN 109 115 595 Pty Ltd

2:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Telstra Corporation Limited
v
SMC Marine Pty Ltd t/as Tas Marine Construction

2:15 p.m.
Appoint Administrator
James Crotty and anor
v
The Attorney General

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention

Duayne Geoffrey Venn

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial
MAC

4.15pm For Bail Application
Luke Anthony Shaw

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of cases on the listed date, with matters both criminal and civil coming before the court. In the criminal jurisdiction, Cosmas Paite faced a directions hearing, while Stuart Norton Woods had a part-heard trial and Kristie Lee Graham was called as a witness. In the civil jurisdiction, Chris Boland brought a claim against the Legal Profession Board and others, and there were directions hearings for cases involving Groove On Productions Pty Ltd, Telstra Corporation Limited, and James Crotty. The Launceston court had matters involving Duayne Geoffrey Venn and Luke Anthony Shaw.

The legal issues presented to the court varied according to the nature of each case. In the criminal cases, the court was tasked with overseeing the progress of trials and directions hearings, determining appropriate next steps in the proceedings. For the civil cases, the court needed to consider directions and amendments to statements of claim, guiding the parties through the litigation process and ensuring that the proceedings were conducted fairly and efficiently.

The court addressed each case according to its specific circumstances, providing directions and rulings as necessary. For example, in the matter of Chris Boland, the court allowed an amendment to the statement of claim, while in the case of Telstra Corporation Limited, the court appointed an administrator. The court's decisions were aimed at ensuring that the legal process was followed and that the rights of the parties were protected.

The final orders of the court reflected the specific outcomes of each case, with directions issued, hearings scheduled, and administrative appointments made as required. The court's role was to provide guidance and oversight in the legal proceedings, facilitating the resolution of the disputes before it.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 13

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established