LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 10 MARCH 2021
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
Cassandra Helene Murray
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
R H K
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
For Trial
MJP
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Nancy Carolann Jane White and ors v Galina Verjbitsky and anor
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Heath Lance Chatters
4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
Melinda Ann Berry
For Sentencing Submissions
David Hau Moeakiola
Not before 11:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
ABM
4:00p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Justin James Browne
For Bail Application
Kye John Edward Charles Louney
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Dong Jo Shin and anor v Yong Tae Cho and anor
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Dong Jo Shin and anor v Yong Tae Cho and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
Jeffrey Robert Anderson
For Trial
Mark Richard Nicholas
10:30am
For Trial
KJB
(Part-heard)
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
For Plea
Christopher Leigh Brown
4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Shaun Albert Leonard
For Legal Argument
SRR
4:00 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions and Sentence
via video-link to Magistrates Court, Griffith Street, Devonport
Bradley Frank Richards
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 69
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice WOOD presided over a sentencing submission for Cassandra Helene Murray, while Justice PEARCE dealt with a directions hearing for Derek Leslie Graeme Smith via telephone. Justice BRETT handled a directions hearing for Nancy Carolann Jane White and others against Galina Verjbitsky and another, and a bail application for Justin James Browne via video-link. Associate Justice HOLT was responsible for a directions hearing for Dong Jo Shin and another against Yong Tae Cho and another, and a bail consent hearing for Jeffrey Robert Anderson. Lastly, Justice ESTCOURT addressed a trial for Shaun Albert Leonard in Burnie.
The legal issues before the court encompassed the appropriate sentencing for Murray, directions for Smith, bail for Browne, and the resolution of a dispute between White and Verjbitsky. The court also considered the case of Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho, focusing on bail and directions for Anderson, as well as the trial for Leonard.
Justice WOOD considered the submissions for Murray's sentencing, taking into account the seriousness of the offence and the offender's background. Justice PEARCE provided directions for Smith's case, ensuring the process was on track and addressing any procedural concerns. Justice BRETT handled the bail application for Browne, evaluating the risk of flight and ensuring the safety of the community. The directions hearing for White and Verjbitsky's case was aimed at expediting the legal process. Associate Justice HOLT guided the parties in the dispute between Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho, focusing on procedural fairness and expeditious resolution. Lastly, Justice ESTCOURT presided over Leonard's trial, ensuring a fair hearing and proper legal arguments.
The court's outcomes included sentencing guidelines for Murray, procedural directions for Smith, bail decisions for Browne and Anderson, and the ongoing management of the dispute between White and Verjbitsky, as well as Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho. The trial for Leonard was scheduled to proceed as per the court's directives.
The legal issues before the court encompassed the appropriate sentencing for Murray, directions for Smith, bail for Browne, and the resolution of a dispute between White and Verjbitsky. The court also considered the case of Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho, focusing on bail and directions for Anderson, as well as the trial for Leonard.
Justice WOOD considered the submissions for Murray's sentencing, taking into account the seriousness of the offence and the offender's background. Justice PEARCE provided directions for Smith's case, ensuring the process was on track and addressing any procedural concerns. Justice BRETT handled the bail application for Browne, evaluating the risk of flight and ensuring the safety of the community. The directions hearing for White and Verjbitsky's case was aimed at expediting the legal process. Associate Justice HOLT guided the parties in the dispute between Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho, focusing on procedural fairness and expeditious resolution. Lastly, Justice ESTCOURT presided over Leonard's trial, ensuring a fair hearing and proper legal arguments.
The court's outcomes included sentencing guidelines for Murray, procedural directions for Smith, bail decisions for Browne and Anderson, and the ongoing management of the dispute between White and Verjbitsky, as well as Dong Jo Shin and Yong Tae Cho. The trial for Leonard was scheduled to proceed as per the court's directives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.