LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 1 APRIL 2020
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie
Anthony Leonard Clark
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Brian Gardam
T L R
N D T
11:30 a.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Gary Lee Mann
12:20 p.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Darren AndrewWinwood
Gerard Caleb McDermott
Karli Breeze Newitt
12:30 p.m
For Plea
Dylan James Shaw
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link
B G M
4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link
Michael Leonard Linnell
4:30 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link
Zannon Tony Howard
Zoe Leanne Whiley
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Maree Matic v Simpson Networks Pty Ltd
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Desiree Simone Evans
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Sean William McKenzie
Michael Linden Dennison
James Stuart Walker
Shannon Lee Burridge
For Bail Variation via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Hossein Gholami
4:15p.m.
For Plea via video link to
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Sean Peter Burk
Court 2, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:20 am
Gary Robert Oliver v
Gabrielle Anne Edwards
Pre-Hearing Conference by Telephone
9:40 am
Judith Rose Barber v Joy Elizabeth Barber
as executrix of the Estate of the late Rex Ernest Barber
Pre-Hearing Conference by Telephone
2:15 pm
Adrian Lacroix v Peter Dennis Auksorius
Produce testamentary scripts
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention via Video Link
Bianca Elizabeth Pyke
For Bail Application (and Preliminary Proceedings
Application) via Video Link
Natalie Maher
For Bail Consent
Rikki James Williams
12:00p.m.
Joshua Clifford Thomas Smith
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Anthony Leonard Clark
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link
Zoe Leanne Whiley
Details
- Case
- [2020] TASSCCourtlist 125
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Anthony Leonard Clark was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania by Chief Justice Blow. Clark faced sentencing for his criminal activities, which had been conducted via a video link from Hobart. The primary dispute centred around the appropriate punishment for Clark's actions, which had already been determined through prior legal proceedings. The court needed to decide on the severity and nature of the sentence that would be commensurate with the gravity of Clark's crimes.
The legal issues before the court involved assessing the culpability and impact of Clark's actions, taking into account mitigating and aggravating factors. The court had to balance these considerations to arrive at a sentence that would serve as a just and effective deterrent, while also considering the principles of rehabilitation and proportionality. Chief Justice Blow evaluated the evidence and arguments presented, focusing on the specific circumstances of the crime and Clark's background.
In rendering his decision, Chief Justice Blow carefully weighed the various aspects of the case. He concluded that the appropriate sentence would reflect the seriousness of the offence and ensure public protection. The final order was that Clark be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific conditions and considerations for his rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
The legal issues before the court involved assessing the culpability and impact of Clark's actions, taking into account mitigating and aggravating factors. The court had to balance these considerations to arrive at a sentence that would serve as a just and effective deterrent, while also considering the principles of rehabilitation and proportionality. Chief Justice Blow evaluated the evidence and arguments presented, focusing on the specific circumstances of the crime and Clark's background.
In rendering his decision, Chief Justice Blow carefully weighed the various aspects of the case. He concluded that the appropriate sentence would reflect the seriousness of the offence and ensure public protection. The final order was that Clark be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific conditions and considerations for his rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.