Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 9 August 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 9 AUGUST 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
JMDB

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Marcus Paul Wilson
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stuart Barry Russell
v
State of Tasmania

In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
NDK

For Bail Application
Leslie Rogers

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Gail Burnett
v
Fitzgerald and Browne

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Plea
Christina Vernessa Watson
Tiffany Louise Shaw

2:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
Luke Anthony Shaw

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent

9:30 a.m.

For Trial

Aaron John Brennan

(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a criminal case involving Rodney Matthew Klye and Jodie Diane Earley. The nature of the dispute was a part-heard case for trial, with sentencing scheduled for later in the day. Another case heard by Justice Estcourt involved Marcus Paul Wilson, with a part-heard trial and directions hearing scheduled. The court also handled an application to vary bail by NDK and a bail application by Leslie Rogers. In civil matters, Associate Justice Holt presided over a case involving Gail Burnett versus Fitzgerald and Browne.

The legal issues the court needed to address included the evidence presented in the criminal cases, the sentencing of the defendants, and the outcome of the bail applications. The court had to consider the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, as well as the applicable laws and precedents. In the civil case, the court had to evaluate the claims and defenses presented by both parties and make a decision based on the evidence and legal principles.

Justice Wood and Justice Estcourt, after considering the evidence and arguments, reached their decisions on the matters before them. The court determined the outcomes for the criminal cases, including the sentencing of the defendants and the bail applications. In the civil case, Associate Justice Holt made a decision based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. The final outcomes of these cases were recorded in the court's decision, providing clarity and resolution for the parties involved.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 9 August 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established