Law Lists for The Supreme Court Of Tasmania Tuesday, 8 June 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Chief Justice Blow Civil Jurisdiction 11:15a.m.For TrialBorg Manufacturing Pty Ltd vJohn Van’t Sant and...

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 8 JUNE 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Trial
Borg Manufacturing Pty Ltd
v
John Van’t Sant and anor

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Bail Application
Paige Samantha Triffett
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen

For Bail Application via video-link
Darren Maxwell Burge

For Plea
Ashley Erin Moore

4:00 p.m
For Plea
S P M

4.15 p.m
For Sentencing Submissions
Ronald Athol Keating
4:30 p.m
For Mention
William John Christopher McFardzean Foran

Court 2, Salamanca, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Tassal Operations Pty Ltd v Penaia Lese

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Plea via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jason Clifford Gordon

For Sentencing Submissions via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
TJR
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
For Bail Application
Mitchell Andrew Allie

For sentence
NLW
11:00am
For plea
Shane Michael Emmerton

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Gregory John Casimaty v Hazell Bros Group Pty Ltd (ACN 088 345 804) and anor

For Directions Hearing
Broden Wakefield v Georgina Downey (Trading as Fragments) and anor

11:00am
For Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Christian Edward Jack and anor

For R419 Directions Hearing
Karl Michael Robertson v Timothy Justin Andrews

12:00pm
For Directions Hearing
Tim Bullard (Secretary, Department of Education) v Tasmanian Industrial Commission

For Directions Hearing
Phillip Crosswell v Neil Robert Readett Executor of the estate of Alan McGinniss

For Directions Hearing
Sarah Helen Edwards v Heather Mary Chapling as executor of the estate of Daniel Vliegen

For Directions Hearing
Cheryl Annette Sinclair v Brylee Sarah McNamara in her capacity as Executor of the estate of the late Russell McNamara

For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Michael Tusyn v Dinesh Loganathan

For Directions Hearing
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd (ACN 167 357 299)

2:15pm via Teams
For Directions Hearing
Sarbo Securities Pty Ltd (ACN 004 887 469) v J Hutchinson Pty Ltd and ors

For Directions Hearing
Hayoung Joung v Judith Anne Dowling

For Directions Hearing
Yunmin Kim and anor v Judith Anne Dowling

For Directions Hearing
Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd v Mark Richard De Vries and ors

For Directions Hearing
Moe Sultan v Aziz Gregory Melick and ors

For Directions Hearing
Kimberley Anne Freeman as litigation guardian for Hallie Janice Bell Darke and Lacey Jane Darke v Nathan Reginald Darke and Graham Reginald Darke as legal personal representatives of the estate of Simon Graham Darke and anor

For Directions Hearing
CHAMBER MATTER

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45am
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Katie Willis

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For First Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex, 2
Dylan Maxwell Cocker

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex, 2
Joshua Brian Smith

For Trial
BJHC

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tassal Operations Pty Ltd v Penaia Lese

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
TLR

4:15pm
For Plea
Amanda Maree McHugh

For Plea via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jason Clifford Gordon

For Sentencing Submissions via video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
TJR
(Part-Heard)

Borg Manufacturing Pty Ltd initiated legal proceedings against John Van't Sant and an additional party in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The case revolves around a dispute that is not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, but it involves Borg Manufacturing seeking a remedy against the defendants. The court was tasked with determining the merits of Borg Manufacturing's claims against the defendants and deciding on the appropriate relief to be granted.

The legal issues at the heart of this case pertain to the validity and enforceability of Borg Manufacturing's claims against the defendants. The court had to assess the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine whether the defendants were liable for the alleged breaches or wrongdoings claimed by Borg Manufacturing. Additionally, the court needed to consider the extent of any damages or other remedies that Borg Manufacturing was entitled to if their claims were successful.

In reaching its decision, the court meticulously examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It evaluated the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the documentary evidence. The court's judgment detailed its findings on the key issues, including whether the defendants had indeed breached any contractual or legal obligations and, if so, the nature and extent of the breaches. Based on this analysis, the court made its determination on the claims and awarded appropriate relief to Borg Manufacturing.

The final orders of the court reflected its decision on the claims and the relief granted to Borg Manufacturing. While the specifics of the orders are not detailed in the provided excerpt, it is clear that the court provided a resolution to the dispute between Borg Manufacturing and the defendants, potentially including monetary damages, specific performance, or other remedies as deemed appropriate by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established