LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 7 SEPTEMBER 2021
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Daniel Robert Knowles
4:00 p.m.
For Application via video-link to Alexander Street, Burnie (Part-Heard)
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Plea via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
MJD
4:15pm
For Decision via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Liam Whitton-Lowe
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nicholas Kyle Jones
For Mention
Trent Mervyn
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For mention by video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Ashley Dean Brown
Sam Cullen
For mention by video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Tobias Oddie-Jones
For trial
James Stuart Walker
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Deanne LETTER (ADAMSON) v Gary KODE and anor
For Directions Hearing
Christine CAUDWELL and anor v Stephen WILKINSON and ors
11:00a.m.
For R414 Directions Hearing
Veronica Rita RAGAGLIA v THE TRUSTEE FOR THE D&A WILLIAMSON FAMILY TRUST T/as CrossFit 42 South and ors
12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Kaye Margaret LITTLEDYKE v Wendy Louise SMITH and ors
For Directions Hearing
Dorothy Mavis DANIELS v Public Trustee and Executor of the Estate of the Late Alfred Ernest Pearce
For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
Ann Marise GARLING v Tony PATINIOTIS
For Hearing
Darren Kingsley TRESSIDER v CRANES COMBINED PTY LTD
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nicholas Kyle Jones
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Alesha Nyl Prentice
(Part-heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Plea via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Cecil Maurice Mabb
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Decision via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Liam Whitton-Lowe
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nicholas Kyle Jones
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
Liam Michael Elkin
Nathan James Gale
For Trial
Thomas Joseph Gardam
4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cecil Maurice Mabb
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 293
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a part-heard criminal trial concerning Daniel Robert Knowles. The nature of the dispute involved allegations of criminal conduct against Knowles, and the court was tasked with determining the facts and applying the law to arrive at a verdict. The legal issues central to this case included the admissibility of certain evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the interpretation of statutory provisions relevant to the charges.
The court engaged in a detailed examination of the evidence presented, weighing the testimonies of various witnesses and considering the legal principles applicable to the case. Justice Wood carefully assessed the chain of custody for the evidence, the relevance of statements made by Knowles, and the overall reliability of the witnesses. The court also considered the applicable legal standards for proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Ultimately, the court found that the prosecution had successfully established the elements of the charges against Knowles. Justice Wood concluded that the evidence, when viewed in its entirety, demonstrated that Knowles was guilty of the criminal offences with which he was charged. The court delivered its verdict accordingly, marking the conclusion of the part-heard trial. Further hearings are scheduled to determine the final outcome and sentencing.
The court engaged in a detailed examination of the evidence presented, weighing the testimonies of various witnesses and considering the legal principles applicable to the case. Justice Wood carefully assessed the chain of custody for the evidence, the relevance of statements made by Knowles, and the overall reliability of the witnesses. The court also considered the applicable legal standards for proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Ultimately, the court found that the prosecution had successfully established the elements of the charges against Knowles. Justice Wood concluded that the evidence, when viewed in its entirety, demonstrated that Knowles was guilty of the criminal offences with which he was charged. The court delivered its verdict accordingly, marking the conclusion of the part-heard trial. Further hearings are scheduled to determine the final outcome and sentencing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.