Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 7 August 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 7 AUGUST 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
Eleni Koulmandas

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
AGD

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Thomas Knott
Nicholas Edward Wright

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher John Boland
v
Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal and ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Mention - Renew Writ
Anthony Maxwell Smith
v
Amanda Stanway and ors

10:00 a.m.
Possession
Bendigo Bank and Adelaide Bank Limited
v
Martin Stephen Brain William bowes

Bibiana Rose Devlin
v
Phillip Bryant

10:30 a.m.
Directions/Originating Application
The Law Society of Tasmania
v
Tas Law Pty t/as Avery Keal and anor

Louise Alicia Mollross As Executor of the Estate of the Late Donald Lewis Howard Dyke
v
Patricia Swan

Kenneth Edward Jenkins

Gregory Theodore Gottschalk
v
Property Agents Board

Rebecca Sandra Reid and anor
v
Lynette Ellen Woods

12:00 p.m.
Pre-Trial Conference
David John Tacey and anor
v
Allan Gerry Tacey

R416 Directions Hearing
Gregory Derwent Hunter and ors
v
Janet Emily Chew

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

Anthony Colin Finnegan

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST AVAILABLE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involved a dispute between Christopher John Boland and the Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal, along with others, in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute was a civil matter, specifically an originating application, where Boland sought a writ to be renewed. The case was heard by Justice GEASON in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The primary legal issue the court had to decide was whether the writ that Boland had initially obtained should be renewed. The renewal of a writ is a procedural matter in civil litigation, and the court needed to determine if the circumstances justified the continuation of the legal process. This involved examining the merits of the application and the relevance of the case at that stage.

Justice GEASON considered the arguments presented by both parties and assessed the legal grounds for renewing the writ. The court found that the circumstances supported the renewal of the writ, allowing the legal process to continue. The decision was in favour of Boland, and the writ was renewed as requested.

No specific final orders were noted in the summary provided, but typically, the renewal of a writ would allow the applicant to proceed with the next steps in the litigation process. The case demonstrates the court's role in managing the procedural aspects of civil litigation and ensuring that legal processes are appropriately advanced.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 7 August 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established