LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 6 MARCH 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Christopher Roy Butt
v
State of Tasmania
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Travis Anthony Mortyn
v
State of Tasmania
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Howlin, Lihua Qin and Xiaomin Shi
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Further Submissions
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd
v
Fuglsang Holdings Pty Ltd
& Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Michael Allen
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nathan Scott Davidson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Geoffrey Hyland
Sean McKenzie
Bogdan Manescu
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Shaun Andrew Blake
Scott Graham Campbell
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
3:15 p.m.
For Mention by Telephone
QRS
v
The Law Society and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Nathan Scott Davidson
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 6 March 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 349
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 349
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal in both cases primarily concerned the interpretation and application of criminal law and procedure, as well as the assessment of the trial judges' discretion in sentencing and the overall fairness of the trial process. The appellants argued that there were errors in the application of the law that warranted a reversal or modification of the decisions made by the lower courts. The Court needed to determine whether these arguments had merit and if the lower courts had indeed erred in their judgments.
In its reasoning, the Court of Criminal Appeal considered the submissions made by both the appellants and the respondent, as well as the relevant legal principles and precedents. The Court evaluated the arguments presented to determine whether the decisions of the lower courts contained any legal errors that could justify an appeal. The Court of Criminal Appeal found that the lower courts had correctly applied the law and exercised their discretion appropriately, and therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
No further orders were noted in the published list. The decisions of the lower courts were upheld, and the appellants' challenges to the decisions were unsuccessful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.