LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY 6 AUGUST 2019
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Chauncy Aaron Bell
(part-heard)
Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Norman Edward Ohl
v
State of Tasmania
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Matthew John Davey
For Application
David John Eaton
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Rachel Ellen Morgan
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher John Worker
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:00 am
Miscellaneous Civil business
12 Noon
Miscellaneous Civil business
2:15pm
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Allan McCulloch
(Part-Heard)
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Rachel Ellen Morgan
For Sentence
Emma Jane Fisher
For Bail Application
George Matthew Jeffrey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
CJW
4:15p.m.
For Bail Variation
Braydon Charles Heyward
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 6 August 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 158
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of criminal law in various contexts. For instance, the court needed to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused in trials, assess the appropriate sentences for those found guilty, and decide on bail applications. The court also had to consider the procedural aspects of the cases, such as the admissibility of evidence and the compliance with legal formalities.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific case. For example, in the case of Chauncy Aaron Bell, the court heard evidence and arguments before reaching a decision on the accused's guilt. Similarly, in the case of Rachel Ellen Morgan, the court considered the submissions for sentencing and decided on the appropriate punishment. The court's decisions were based on the evidence presented, legal principles, and the specific circumstances of each case. The outcomes included convictions, sentences, and bail decisions.
The final orders of the court were documented in the case summaries. These orders reflected the court's decisions on guilt, sentencing, and bail. The outcomes were communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records. The court's decisions aimed to uphold the rule of law and ensure justice in each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.