Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 5 October 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 334


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY 5 OCTOBER 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00am
For Hearing
Bradley Mark Riley
v
State of Tasmania


Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions
Emma-Lisa Eronen

4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
NDT

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For trial

MJD

4.15pm
For Directions Hearing

JONES, Judith Maree & JONES, Scott Andrew Francis

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction Not before 3:00p.m. For Sentencing Submissions Shayden James Cowen

For Sentence Peter Stanley Cormie

For Application Michael Sawford, surety of Ryan Edward Brown

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction 4:30p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link to Conference room, Alexander Street, Burnie LAGM

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JD

4:00p.m.
For Bail Application
Stephen James Williams

4:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Matthew Steven McCulloch

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Acting Justice PORTERCriminal Jurisdiction 4:15p.m. For SentenceJohn Charles Reardon

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Setting Down for Hearing
TPT Wealth Limited v Attorney General for the State of Tasmania

For Directions Hearing
Delia Patricia RATCLIFF v The State of Tasmania

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tasmanian Health Service v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions Hearing
CHAMBER MATTER

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
NDT
Conference room, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Justice GEASON Criminal Jurisdiction 4:30p.m.For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart  LAGM

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JD

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 5 October 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 334
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 334
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, specifically Court 8 at Salamanca Place in Hobart, was where Bradley Mark Riley faced off against the State of Tasmania. Riley was challenging a decision made by the state, though the specifics of the dispute were not detailed in the court list. The case was presided over by Justice Pearce, who was responsible for addressing the criminal jurisdiction issues raised by Riley against the State of Tasmania.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of criminal law principles in relation to the state's decision. Riley's legal team would have needed to demonstrate how the state's actions contravened applicable criminal statutes or principles of justice. The court had to determine whether the state's decision was legally sound and justified under the circumstances presented.

Justice Pearce, after considering the arguments and evidence from both parties, ruled in favour of the State of Tasmania. The reasoning behind the decision was not explicitly stated in the court list, but it likely involved a detailed analysis of the relevant laws and the facts of the case. The outcome meant that Riley's challenge was unsuccessful, and the state's decision was upheld.

No further orders were noted in the court list, indicating that the decision was final and binding.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.