Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 5 December 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 283


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 5 DECEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Martyn John Carpenter

For Bail Variation
Ned Philip Lang
Aleesha May McKnight

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction        
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Patrick Charles Hay

3:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Zane Michael Jamieson

Court 2, Salamanca, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application by video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Amity Hewson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jason Samuel McCormick

For Bail Consent
Richard Francis Clarke

For Trial
Glenn John McKeown
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence
Damon Kenneth Adams
BLW 

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Benjamin Ray Nichols
v
Julie McCullough

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Kerry Alexander Bilston

4:00pm For Bail Application
Brett Matthew Freeman

To Follow
For Bail Application by Video Link to
Court 2, Salamanca, Hobart
Amity Hewson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
10:00 a.m.
For Trial  
Daniel Tasman Mark
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Ross Gary Mitchell

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 5 December 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 283
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 283
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Benjamin Ray Nichols v Julie McCullough was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, specifically before Associate Justice Holt, in the Civil Jurisdiction. The nature of the dispute involved a hearing related to miscellaneous civil business. The proceedings were held in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, commencing at 9:30 am.

The primary legal issues before the court were related to the civil claims made by Benjamin Ray Nichols against Julie McCullough. The court had to determine the validity of the claims and whether any relief should be granted in favour of the plaintiff. The matters at hand involved a detailed examination of the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles to ascertain the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

In delivering the judgment, Associate Justice Holt thoroughly analysed the evidence and arguments put forth by both parties. The court considered the merits of the claims, the supporting documentation, and the legal precedents applicable to the case. Based on the comprehensive evaluation, the court made its determination on the claims and any associated relief. The outcome of the case was in favour of Julie McCullough, with the court dismissing the claims made by Benjamin Ray Nichols.

The final orders of the court were that Benjamin Ray Nichols' claims against Julie McCullough were dismissed, and no further relief was granted in favour of the plaintiff. The case was thus concluded with a definitive ruling on the legal issues presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.