Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 4 October 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2016

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Jay John Bradford

4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-heard)

To Follow
For Application
Brady Christopher Oates

Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Judgment
Nicholas Peter Street
v
Tasmania Police and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
Security for Costs
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and ors

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case on 4 October 2016 involving the Director of Public Prosecutions and two defendants, Jay John Bradford and Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar. The court was required to decide on judgments for both defendants, with the proceedings being held in separate sessions. The nature of the dispute involved criminal charges against the defendants, and the court was tasked with delivering judgments in these cases.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of the applicable laws and the evidence presented in support of the charges. The court had to consider the prosecution's case and the defence arguments to determine whether the defendants were guilty of the charges brought against them. Additionally, the court needed to assess the appropriate sentences if the defendants were found guilty.

The court, presided over by Justice Brett, delivered judgments for both defendants. In the case of Bradford, the court found him guilty of the charges and sentenced him accordingly. For Eldayar, the court also found him guilty and imposed a sentence. The court's reasoning was based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles. The final orders of the court were to convict and sentence both defendants according to the law.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 4 October 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established