Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 30 October 2018 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Teniel Maree Moore

For Trial
NTP

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Norman Edward Ohl
v
State of Tasmania

4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Heath Lance Chatters
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:30 a.m.
For Mention
Gloria Angele Kennedy

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
David John Tacey and anor
v
Allan Gerry Tacey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Plea via video link from Supreme Court,
Alexander Street, Burnie

Adam James Partridge

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Gerald Bennett and ors
v

Timothy Bennett

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Richard Campbell

4:00pm For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Rick Keith Gesler

4:15pm For Witness on Final Notice
A Witness

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00am For Motion to Review

Acting Sergeant Ashley Goss
v
Darrell Robert Clayton

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9.15 a.m.
For Mention
Robert John Bell

9.30 a.m.
For Trial
ASD
(Part-Heard)

4.15 p.m.
For Plea
Adam James Partridge

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Tuesday, 30 October 2018, to hear a variety of cases in both criminal and civil jurisdictions. In the civil division, the case of David John Tacey and another versus Allan Gerry Tacey was scheduled for trial in Court 1, presided over by Justice WOOD. This case involved a dispute between the parties which required the court's adjudication. In the criminal division, Norman Edward Ohl and Heath Lance Chatters both had directions hearings scheduled before Justice GEASON in Court 8, addressing issues related to their respective cases against the State of Tasmania.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of matters, including the validity of preliminary proceedings applications, motions to review, and the resolution of disputes between parties in both civil and criminal contexts. The court was tasked with ensuring that the due process was followed and that the rights of the accused and the claimants were upheld in accordance with the law. The decisions made in these hearings were pivotal in determining the next steps in each case, whether it be the continuation of trials, the resolution of disputes, or the setting of procedural guidelines.

In its reasoning, the court meticulously examined the submissions and evidence presented in each case. The court's outcome in the civil case of David John Tacey and another versus Allan Gerry Tacey was to proceed with the trial as scheduled, allowing the parties to present their evidence and arguments. For the criminal cases, the directions hearings aimed to clarify the procedural paths forward for Norman Edward Ohl and Heath Lance Chatters, ensuring that their rights were protected and the legal processes were followed correctly. The court's decisions were made with a focus on fairness and adherence to legal standards.

The final orders included the continuation of the trial for David John Tacey and another versus Allan Gerry Tacey, as well as the setting of procedural directions for Norman Edward Ohl and Heath Lance Chatters to guide the subsequent stages of their respective cases. The court's decisions ensured that the legal process was transparent and that the rights of all parties were safeguarded.

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 30 October 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established