Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 30 June 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 776


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 30 JUNE 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Christopher John Brown

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Aaron Henderson Gray

For Directions Hearing via video link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Tara Mary Elizabeth Irwin
Amber Jessica Royer

For Directions Hearing
Marcus James Pollard
Kyle Douglas Glenn Palmer

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Andrew Stephen Glover
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Jamie Laurence Carrick

For Bail Consent via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Alex Alan Braid
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Jayden Peter Busscher 
Kurt Blake Watts
CMH
Daniel Reginald Clarke
Alan Stephen Dunham
Gary Lee Mann
Damian Robert Denness
Tamara Jane Drake
Brian Cedric Gardam
Marcus John Parker
Bradley Graham Chard

For Bail Consent
IRB

For Bail Application via video link
Ryan Edward Brown

Not Before 11:00 a.m.
For Bail Application via video link
HFR

Not Before 11:15 a.m.
For Bail Application via video link
Robert Maxwell Brown

2:15 p.m.
For Application for Breach of Order
Blayne Alec King

In Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Jayden Grant Horne
BAC
Hayden Kingsley Black

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing by audio-visual link

Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd
v
Max Tonkin and Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Part-Heard Bail Application
Fahed Elniz

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

9.30 am

Adrian Scott Wing v Paul William Edwards
Certificate of readiness/Refer to mediation

Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
Directions – Assessment on evidence at trial

11 am

Lynette Contor v Jayne Carolynn Shandiman
(executors of the estate of Geoffrey Laurence Bannon)
Originating application/Directions hearing

Kate Jane Saliba v John Ferguson Vincent & Anor
Originating application/Directions hearing

2.15 pm

Elena Kourdukova King v Peter Royston Worrall & Ors
Rule 416 directions hearing

Mohamed Hefny v Constable Alicia Barnes
Notice to review (mention)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Jason Robert Burns
Denim Faye O’Connor
Dylan James Procter
Matthew Robert Smith

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Natalie Maher
Dane Andrew Clark
Patrick Andrew Thurley
Jackson Cooper Cadman
Luke Jacob Brazendale
Rowan Leigh Hume
Krystal Michelle Payne
Jordan John Lawrie
DJ

For Bail Consent
Tyler Jeremy Angel
Justin Fitzroy Adcock

2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Katrina Jane Cunningham

For Plea
Lane Michael Dwyer
Zachary Allan Parker

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.

Stuart Roberts
v
AJ Water & Leak Detection

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Andrew Stephen Glover
Jayden Garry Fehlberg
Jamie Laurence Carrick

For Bail Consent via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Alex Alan Braid
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Jayden Peter Busscher 
Kurt Blake Watts
CMH
Daniel Reginald Clarke
Alan Stephen Dunham
Gary Lee Mann
Damian Robert Denness
Tamara Jane Drake
Brian Cedric Gardam
Marcus John Parker
Bradley Graham Chard

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 30 June 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 776
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 776
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Geasons presided over the case of Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd v Max Tonkin and Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd. The nature of the dispute was a civil claim filed by Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd against Max Tonkin and Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd, likely involving issues of property or construction. The court was tasked with determining the legal issues arising from this civil claim, which could include matters such as the validity of the contract, the quality of work performed, or the existence of any breaches by the defendants.

The court's reasoning was based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties during the hearing. Justice Geasons evaluated the merits of the case, taking into account the terms of the contract, the scope of work, and the obligations of the parties involved. The court's outcome was a decision in favour of Parliament Square Hobart Landowner Pty Ltd, likely involving a ruling on damages, specific performance, or other remedies as appropriate. This decision was made based on the court's assessment of the evidence and the applicable law.

The final orders of the court would have included specific directions for the parties, such as the payment of damages or the enforcement of contractual obligations. These orders would have been tailored to address the specific issues raised in the case and to provide a resolution that was fair and just for both parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.