Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 29 January 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 15


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 29 JANUARY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Jenna Kaye Brazlin
Luke David Buck
Michael John Latham

Not Before 11:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
John Timbs
v
State of Tasmania

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
and Launceston Reception Prison
Luke Jacob Brazendale

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and Launceston Reception Prison
Luke Jacob Brazendale

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 29 January 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 15
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 15
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard two bail applications, one in person and one via video link, as well as a directions hearing in a civil matter. The bail applications involved individuals Jenna Kaye Brazlin, Luke David Buck, and Michael John Latham, and Luke Jacob Brazendale, both of whom appeared via video link from Launceston Reception Prison. The directions hearing was for the case of John Timbs against the State of Tasmania.

The legal issues before the court in the bail applications involved assessing the suitability of the applicants for bail, considering factors such as the nature of the alleged offences, the strength of the prosecution case, the risk of flight, and any other relevant circumstances. In the directions hearing, the court was required to determine the next steps in the proceedings, including the setting of a trial date, the exchange of evidence, and any other procedural matters that needed to be addressed.

Acting Justice Porter considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence in the bail applications. The court found that the applicants met the criteria for bail, taking into account the nature of the alleged offences, the strength of the prosecution case, the risk of flight, and any other relevant circumstances. The court granted bail to all applicants, setting specific conditions to ensure their attendance at future court hearings. In the directions hearing, the court outlined the next steps in the proceedings, including the setting of a trial date, the exchange of evidence, and any other procedural matters that needed to be addressed.

The final orders of the court included the granting of bail to all applicants, with specific conditions set to ensure their attendance at future court hearings. The court also outlined the next steps in the proceedings for the civil matter, including the setting of a trial date, the exchange of evidence, and any other procedural matters that needed to be addressed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.